Diagnostic value of urine sCD163 levels for sepsis and relevant acute kidney injury: a prospective study
- Longxiang Su†1, 2, 4, 6,
- Lin Feng†3,
- Changting Liu†6,
- Zhaoxu Jiang1, 2, 4,
- Ming Li1, 2, 4,
- Kun Xiao1, 4,
- Peng Yan1,
- Yanhong Jia4,
- Dan Feng5 and
- Lixin Xie1, 4Email author
© Su et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 March 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2012
Published: 26 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Pickering|
|5 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Simoni|
|30 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lixin Xie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Pickering|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|26 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-13-123|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.