Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation?: Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments
© Clark et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 21 March 2011
Accepted: 29 October 2012
Published: 22 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evangelos Mazaris|
|16 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - silas p norman|
|8 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Geddes|
|30 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Clark|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evangelos Mazaris|
|14 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Geddes|
|23 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - silas p norman|
|26 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Clark|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-13-152|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.