Transfusion burden in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients with persistent anemia treated in routine clinical practice: a retrospective observational study
© Fox et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 July 2011
Accepted: 24 January 2012
Published: 24 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jul 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Minutolo|
|21 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Gilbertson|
|21 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kathleen Fox|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Minutolo|
|25 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Gilbertson|
|30 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kathleen Fox|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Minutolo|
|19 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kathleen Fox|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-13-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.