Unexpected recovery from longterm renal failure in severe diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis
- Sophia Ross†1,
- Kerstin Benz†1Email author,
- Katja Sauerstein1,
- Kerstin Amann2,
- Jörg Dötsch3 and
- Katalin Dittrich4
© Ross et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 23 January 2012
Accepted: 28 July 2012
Published: 6 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kerstin Amann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yuji Kamijo|
|5 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - hui kim yap|
|6 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kerstin Amann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yuji Kamijo|
|2 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - hui kim yap|
|9 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kerstin Amann|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-13-81|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.