Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Incidence and outcome of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in a mixed medical-surgical ICU population: a retrospective study

  • Christophe Clec’h1, 2Email author,
  • Dominique Razafimandimby1,
  • Mehdi Laouisset1,
  • Frank Chemouni1 and
  • Yves Cohen1
BMC Nephrology201314:31

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-31

Received: 10 August 2012

Accepted: 31 January 2013

Published: 4 February 2013

Abstract

Background

Contrast-enhanced radiographic examinations carry the risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). While CA-AKI is a well-known complication outside the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, data on CA-AKI in ICU patients are scarce. Our aim was to assess the incidence and short-term outcome of CA-AKI in a mixed medical-surgical ICU population.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis between September 2006 and December 2008 on adult patients who underwent a contrast-enhanced computed tomography for urgent diagnostic purposes. CA-AKI was defined as either a relative increment in serum creatinine of ≥ 25% or an absolute increment in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hrs after contrast administration. ICU mortality rates of patients with and without CA-AKI were compared in univariate and multivariate analyses. The need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) was also recorded.

Results

CA-AKI occurred in 24/143 (16.8%) patients. Coexisting risk factors for kidney injury, such as sepsis, nephrotoxic drugs and hemodynamic failure were commonly observed in patients who developed CA-AKI. ICU mortality was significantly higher in patients with than in those without CA-AKI (50% vs 21%, p = 0.004). In multivariate logistic regression, CA-AKI remained associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio: 3.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-11.46, p = 0.04). RRT was required in 7 (29.2%) patients with CA-AKI.

Conclusions

In our cohort, CA-AKI was a frequent complication. It was associated with a poor short-term outcome and seemed to occur mainly when multiple risk factors for kidney injury were present. Administration of ICM should be considered as a potential high-risk procedure and not as a routine innocuous practice in ICU patients.

Keywords

Acute kidney injury Contrast-associated acute kidney injury Intensive car unit Mortality Outcome

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in both general and intensive care unit (ICU) patients, that significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality [15].

Among the multiple causes of hospital-acquired AKI, administration of iodinated contrast media (ICM) has been found to be the third commonest one [6], and contrast-associated AKI (CA-AKI) has been reported to be responsible for a 5.5-fold increased risk of death [7].

In the specific ICU setting, administration of ICM to patients with otherwise multiple risk factors for AKI (sepsis, nephrotoxic drugs, and hemodynamic failure) may be even more deleterious. Paradoxically, few studies [814] have focused on CA-AKI in these high-risk patients, who very frequently undergo contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Moreover, both the incidence and outcome of CA-AKI vary widely across studies according to case mix and definitions of AKI.

Despite CA-AKI being a well-known complication outside the ICU, the paucity and the discrepancy of data in the ICU justifies additional data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and short-term outcome of CA-AKI in a mixed medical-surgical ICU population.

Methods

Study design and patients

This retrospective study was carried out in the medical-surgical ICU of the Avicenne teaching hospital (Bobigny, France). All adult patients who required a contrast-enhanced CT for urgent diagnostic purposes between September 2006 and December 2008 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with coronary or non coronary angiography were not considered because they do not correspond to our usual patient population. Exclusion criteria were: history of chronic kidney disease, AKI with or without renal replacement therapy (RRT) before administration of ICM, and multiple administrations of ICM. For patients who were admitted more than once to the ICU, only the first ICU stay was included in the analysis.

The decision to perform a contrast-enhanced CT was left at the attending physicians’ discretion. During the whole study period, iso-osmolar media only were used. There were no written protocols for either CA-AKI prevention or dosing of ICM. Indications for and modalities of RRT were also left at the attending physicians’ discretion. No patient received “prophylactic” RRT after administration of ICM.

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Commission Qualité Sécurité et Ethique des Soins, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France) and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Since the study implied no change in patients’ management and data were anonymously processed, the need for informed consent was waived.

Definition of CA-AKI

In the absence of consensual definition criteria, CA-AKI was defined as either a relative increment in serum creatinine of ≥ 25%, as in many prior reports [15], or as an absolute increment in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (26 μmol/L), as suggested by the Acute Kidney Injury Network [16], within 48 hours after administration of ICM.

The term “contrast-associated” instead of “contrast-induced” AKI was preferred because the development of AKI in the ICU setting is often of multiple origins, thus making hazardous to consider the administration of ICM as the unique cause for AKI. Rather, the nephrotoxicity of ICM may be cumulative (ie, may occur mainly when other risk factors for AKI are present).

Data collection

For each patient, the following variables were collected:
  • Baseline characteristics: age, gender, SAPS II score, Mc Cabe class (class 1, no fatal underlying disease; class 2, underlying disease fatal within 5 years; class 3, underlying disease fatal within 1 year), admission category (medical, scheduled surgery, or unscheduled surgery), and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, myeloma and other chronic coexisting conditions defined according to the Knaus criteria [17]),

  • Serum creatinine values measured on the CT day before administration of ICM, and 24 hours and 48 hours thereafter,

  • Additional risk factors for AKI occurring within 48 hours before and after administration of ICM: sepsis, hemodynamic failure and prescription of potential nephrotoxic drugs (aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, loop diuretics),

  • Presence or absence of preventive measures (N-acetylcysteine or isotonic crystalloids), and

  • Impact of CA-AKI: need for RRT within 48 hours after administration of ICM, ICU mortality, length of ICU stay and persistent need for renal support on ICU discharge.

Endpoints

The primary endpoints were the incidence of CA-AKI and short-term outcome of CA-AKI (ie, need for RRT and ICU mortality).

The secondary endpoints were the length of ICU stay, and persistent need for renal support on ICU discharge.

Statistical analyses

Comparisons between patients with and those without CA-AKI were based on the Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables and on the Wilcoxon’s test for continuous variables.

The effect of CA-AKI on ICU mortality was assessed through a logistic regression model. Specifically, we adjusted for patients’ baseline severity reflected by the SAPS II score and for organ dysfunctions before administration of ICM reflected by the non-renal SOFA score (SOFA - renal component). The goodness of fit and the discrimination of the model were determined by the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and the c statistic (area under the curve), respectively. Results are shown as adjusted odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals.

All p values were two-tailed, and a p value < .05 was considered significant.

Statistical analyses were performed using a statistical software package (SAS, version 9.1; SAS Institute; Cary, NC).

Results

Patients

Over the study period, 1639 patients were admitted to our unit. Two hundred fifty-six (15.6%) CTs were required for urgent diagnostic purposes, of whom 194 (75.8%) were contrast-enhanced. Forty patients were excluded. In 11 cases, the patient’s data file was incomplete. Finally, 143 patients were considered for analysis (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2369-14-31/MediaObjects/12882_2012_Article_503_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Study flow chart.

Incidence of CA-AKI and comparison of patients with and without CA-AKI

CA-AKI occurred in 24/143 (16.8%) patients (Figure 1).

There was no difference in serum creatinine before CT between patients with and those without CA-AKI but patients with CA-AKI had more risk factors for AKI within 48 hours before administration of ICM, such as sepsis and hemodynamic failure. Preventive measures were rarely used, without any difference between patients with and those without CA-AKI.

Within 48 hours after administration of ICM, the rate of new risk factors for AKI was similar in the two groups (Table 1).
Table 1

Differences between patients with and those without contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI)

 

No CA-AKI N = 119

CA-AKI N = 24

P

Age (yrs)

61 [49–73]

63 [53–78]

0.33

Male sex

74 (62.2)

15 (62.5)

0.98

SAPS II score

40 [28–57]

57 [41–78]

0.001

Admission category

medical

83 (69.8)

14 (58.3)

0.22

scheduled surgery

11 (9.2)

1 (4.2)

unscheduled surgery

25 (21)

9 (37.5)

Mc Cabe class

1

65 (54.6)

9 (37.5)

0.08

2

38 (31.9)

8 (33.3)

3

16 (13.5)

7 (29.2)

Serum creatinine (μmol/L) before administration of ICM

87 [68–120]

90 [64–128]

0.91

Preventive measure

6 (5)

1(4.2)

1

Risk factors for AKI within 48 hrs before ICM administration

64 (53.8)

20 (83.3)

0.01

diabetes mellitus

24 (20.2)

4 (16.7)

1

myeloma

0 (0)

1 (4.2)

0.17

nephrotoxic drugs

22 (18.5)

7 (29.2)

0.26

sepsis

48 (40.3)

16 (66.7)

0.02

hemodynamic failure

14 (11.8)

11 (45.8)

< 0.001

New risk factors for AKI within 48 hrs after ICM administration

36 (30.2)

7 (29.2)

1

nephrotoxic drugs

19 (16)

4 (16.7)

1

sepsis

30 (25.2)

7 (29.2)

0.63

hemodynamic failure

4 (3.4)

1 (4.2)

0.9

Results are expressed as median [interquartile range] or as number (percent).

ICM, iodinated contrast media.

Association of CA-AKI with renal replacement therapy

RRT was initiated in 7/24 (29.2%) patients with CA-AKI with a median time of 1 day (interquartile range: 0–2) after CA-AKI onset (Figure 1). Patients with CA-AKI who received RRT had similar SAPS II scores and serum creatinine before CT as patients with CA-AKI who did not receive RRT but had more failing organs before CT and were more likely to die in the ICU, although statistical significance was not reached (Table 2). No direct link between administration of ICM and need for RRT could be established due to the absence of consensual indications for RRT and the low number of patients.
Table 2

Differences between patients with contrast-associated acute kidney injury who received and who did not receive renal replacement therapy (RRT)

 

No RRT N = 17

RRT N = 7

P

SAPS II

58 [44–72]

50 [37–92]

0.97

Non-renal SOFA score before ICM administration

5 [4-6]

7 [5-9]

0.24

Serum creatinine (μmol/L) before ICM administration

90 [63–128]

83 [66–198]

0.80

Risk factors for AKI within 48 hrs before ICM administration

14 (82.3)

6 (85.7)

1

diabetes mellitus

3 (17.7)

1 (14.3)

1

myeloma

1 (5.9)

0 (0)

1

nephrotoxic drugs

5 (29.4)

2 (28.6)

1

sepsis

10 (58.9)

6 (85.7)

0.37

hemodynamic failure

7 (41.2)

4 (57.1)

0.76

New risk factors for AKI within 48 hrs after ICM administration

4 (23.5)

3 (42.9)

0.37

nephrotoxic drugs

3 (17.7)

1 (14.3)

1

sepsis

4 (23.5)

3 (42.9)

0.63

hemodynamic failure

0 (0)

1 (14.3)

0.3

Preventive measure

0 (0)

1 (14.3)

0.3

ICU mortality

7 (41.2)

5 (71.4)

0.37

Results are expressed as median [interquartile range] or as number (percent).

ICM, iodinated contrast media; AKI, acute kidney injury; non-renal SOFA score, SOFA score - renal component.

In the two surviving patients with CA-AKI who received RRT, renal function had recovered on ICU discharge.

Association of CA-AKI with mortality

Patients with CA-AKI had a significantly higher crude ICU mortality rate than patients without CA-AKI (50% vs 21%, p = 0.004) (Figure 1). After adjustment for patients’ severity, CA-AKI remained an independent risk factor for ICU mortality (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors independently associated with intensive care unit mortality

Variable

OR

95% CI

P

CA-AKI

3.48

1.10-11.46

0.04

SAPS II score, per point

1.03

1.01-1.05

0.03

Non-renal SOFA score, per point

1.38

1.12-1.71

0.003

Hosmer-Lemeshow chi square = 9.7, p = 0.20, c statistic = 0.80.

CA-AKI, contrast-associated acute kidney injury; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Non-renal SOFA score, SOFA score - renal component.

Association of CA-AKI with length of ICU stay

Patients with and those without CA-AKI had similar lengths of ICU stay (median in days, [interquartile range]: 8 [4–22] vs 8 [6–23], p = 0.66). Among survivors, patients with CA-AKI had a trend towards increased lengths of ICU stay (median in days, [interquartile range]: 8 [4–18] vs 18 [7–26], p = 0.08).

Discussion

While CA-AKI has been extensively investigated outside the ICU setting, few studies on CA-AKI in ICU patients have been carried out so far. Moreover, these studies reported discrepant results regarding the incidence and outcome of CA-AKI according to case mix and definitions of AKI [8–14].

In this work, we did not only assess the incidence of CA-AKI but we also assessed the outcome of patients in terms of need for RRT and ICU mortality. We found CA-AKI to be a frequent event in our mixed medical-surgical population. It was associated with a high risk of ICU death, and tended to increase the length of ICU stay. These results are consistent with the ones of Hoste et al [9]. Remarkably, the ICU mortality in CA-AKI patients observed in this study (50%) was about twice the ICU mortality of all-cause AKI reported in recent studies evaluating the prognosis of AKI, as defined by RIFLE criteria [1, 3, 4]. Another remarkable finding was that most patients with CA-AKI had multiple risk factors for AKI, lending support to the concept of cumulative toxicity (rather than absolute toxicity) of ICM. In addition, RRT failed to reverse renal dysfunction and reduce mortality in CA-AKI patients. Accordingly, administration of ICM should be considered as a potential high-risk procedure and not as a routine innocuous practice in ICU patients, and the technical possibility to put patients on RRT “if necessary” should not be used as an argument to force radiologists to administer ICM.

Although emphasizing the significant burden of CA-AKI in ICU patients, our study has potential limitations. First, we were not able to accurately assess the benefit/risk ratio of contrast-enhanced CT since precise indications of CT and subsequent therapeutic changes were hazardous to extract retrospectively from patients’ files. This important issue deserves further investigation. Second, we did not examine the influence of the volume of ICM and application of preventive measures on the incidence of CA-AKI. The volume of ICM, which has been shown to play a role in the development of CA-AKI, [15] could not be retrospectively retrieved. Regarding preventive measures, they were too rarely used, probably due to the emergency context. It must be stressed, anyhow, that volume expansion and hemodynamic optimization are probably of utmost importance to reduce the risk of CA-AKI, even though the impact of preventive measures in ICU patients needs to be further evaluated. Third, we did not assess the impact of repeated administrations of ICM because of the many confounding factors. Fourth, fluid balance and hemodilution which could have lead to underestimation of CA-AKI incidence (by limiting serum creatinine increase) were not collected. Yet, it must be noticed that this limitation pertains to all studies using the glomerular filtration rate criteria of AKIN or RIFLE definitions. Finally, one may argue that the absence of a “control” group not receiving ICM hinders any definite conclusion as to the actual toxicity of ICM. However, the aim of this study was not to establish the absolute toxicity of ICM but to determine the incidence of CA-AKI and identify potential coexisting risk factors that are important to consider before exposing patients to ICM. Moreover, it must be stressed that patients are undoubtedly their best controls, and that random variations in serum creatinine among “control” patients, that would equate to AKI [18], may expose to biased estimation of the true risk associated with ICM and erroneous inference. In addition, the chronological order of events, the time constraint of 48 hours, and the similar rate of new risk factors for renal dysfunction in patients with and without CA-AKI suggest a cause-effect relationship between administration of ICM and AKI.

Conclusions

In our mixed medical-surgical ICU population requiring contrast-enhanced CTs for urgent diagnostic purposes, CA-AKI was a frequent and severe complication. In keeping with the few available retrospective data, our study indicates that the administration of ICM in patients with otherwise multiple risk factors for AKI should be considered with caution, all the more as CA-AKI may not only impair short-term but also long-term prognosis [9, 19].

Large prospective trials on ICU patients are warranted to more accurately assess the benefit/risk ratio of contrast-enhanced CTs, the role of preventive measures, and the impact of repeated administrations of ICM.

Abbreviations

AKI: 

Acute kidney injury

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

CA-AKI: 

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury

ICM: 

Iodinated contrast media

CT: 

Computed tomography.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical-surgical Intensive Care Unit, Service de réanimation, Hôpital Avicenne, Avicenne teaching Hospital
(2)
INSERM U823, Clinical epidemiology of critically ill patients and airway cancer, Albert Bonniot Institute, Rond-Point de la Chantourne

References

  1. Bagshaw SM, George C, Dinu I: A multi-centre evaluation of the RIFLE criteria for early acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008, 23: 1203-1210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoste EA, Clermont G, Kersten A: RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury are associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysis. Crit Care. 2006, 10: R73-10.1186/cc4915.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ostermann M, Chang RW: Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35: 1837-1843. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000277041.13090.0A. quiz 1852View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clec’h C, Gonzalez F, Lautrette A: Multiple-center evaluation of mortality associated with acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a competing risks analysis. Crit Care. 2011, 15: R128-10.1186/cc10241.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennen P, Douglas IS, Anderson R: Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: an update and primer for the intensivist. Crit Care Med. 2010, 38: 261-275. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181bfb0b5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S: Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002, 39: 930-936. 10.1053/ajkd.2002.32766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Levy EM, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI: The effect of acute renal failure on mortality. A cohort analysis. JAMA. 1996, 275: 1489-1494. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530430033035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Haveman JW, Gansevoort RT, Bongaerts AH: Low incidence of nephropathy in surgical ICU patients receiving intravenous contrast: a retrospective analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2006, 32: 1199-1205. 10.1007/s00134-006-0198-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoste EA, Doom S, De Waele J: Epidemiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37: 1921-1931. 10.1007/s00134-011-2389-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Huber W, Jeschke B, Page M: Reduced incidence of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy in ICU patients under theophylline prophylaxis: a prospective comparison to series of patients at similar risk. Intensive Care Med. 2001, 27: 1200-1209. 10.1007/s001340101003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Polena S, Yang S, Alam R: Nephropathy in critically Ill patients without preexisting renal disease. Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 2005, 48: 134-135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rashid AH, Brieva JL, Stokes B: Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in intensive care patients undergoing computerised tomography and prevalence of risk factors. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009, 37: 968-975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Chaari A: Acute Kidney Injury Network definition of contrast-induced nephropathy in the critically ill: incidence and outcome. J Crit Care. 2011, 26: 593-599. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Valette X, Parienti JJ, Plaud B: Incidence, morbidity, and mortality of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a surgical intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study. J Crit Care. 2012, 27 (322): e1-e5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McCullough PA: Acute kidney injury with iodonated contrast. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36 (Suppl): S204-S211. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318168cdc3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV: Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007, 11: R31-10.1186/cc5713.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985, 13: 818-829. 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Katzberg RW, Lamba R: Contrast-induced nephropathy after intravenous administration: fact or fiction?. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009, 47: 789-800. 10.1016/j.rcl.2009.06.002. vView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Solomon RJ, Mehran R, Natarajan MK: Contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term adverse events: cause and effect?. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 4: 1162-1169. 10.2215/CJN.00550109.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/14/31/prepub

Copyright

© Clec'h et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement