The coincidence of IgA nephropathy and Fabry disease
© Maixnerova et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 7 August 2012
Accepted: 7 January 2013
Published: 11 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Rozenfeld|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francesco Paolo Schena|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kunihiro Yamagata|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isao Ohsawa|
|22 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christoph Kampmann|
|27 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dita Maixnerova|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isao Ohsawa|
|9 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Rozenfeld|
|9 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kunihiro Yamagata|
|19 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dita Maixnerova|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-14-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.