Development of a questionnaire to evaluate practitioners’ confidence and knowledge in primary care in managing chronic kidney disease
© Tahir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 10 March 2013
Accepted: 16 April 2014
Published: 7 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Sozio|
|1 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martinez Ramirez Hector Ramon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Sozio|
|12 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martinez Ramirez Hector Ramon|
|29 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lazza Shaheen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Sozio|
|24 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martinez Ramirez Hector Ramon|
|29 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Lazza Shaheen|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|29 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|7 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-15-73|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.