Comparison of AMG 416 and cinacalcet in rodent models of uremia
© Walter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 3 December 2013
Accepted: 1 May 2014
Published: 19 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Masafumi Fukagawa|
|13 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - piergiorgio messa|
|29 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Derek Maclean|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - piergiorgio messa|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-15-81|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.