Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of predictive equations during follow-up in CKD patients with non-diabetic nephropathies.

From: Accuracy and limitations of equations for predicting the glomerular filtration rate during follow-up of patients with non-diabetic nephropathies

 

Method of GFR estimation

Slope of GFR

(ml/min/1.73 m2/year)

Median and [range]

p value in the Friedman test

(non parametric ANOVA)

P value in Dunn's multiple comparison post-test

Subgroup of patients with deteriorating renal function

(n = 65)

Inulin Clearance

-3.72 [-0.48 to -72]

  
 

GFR Cockcroft-Gault

-4.08 [-0.36 to -60]

 

NS

 

BSA-modified Cockcroft-Gault Formula

-3.48 [-0.24 to -56]

p = 0.29

NS

 

Abbreviated MDRD equation

-3.12 [0 to -64]

 

NS

 

Mayo Clinic Quadratic equation

-3.73 [0 to -78]

 

NS

Subgroup of patients with improving renal function

(n = 61)

Inulin Clearance

+6 [+0.36 to +99]

  
 

GFR Cockcroft-Gault

+4.2 [0 to +102]

p < 0.001

p < 0.05

 

BSA-modified Cockcroft-Gault Formula

+3.36 [+0.12 to +109]

 

p < 0.05

 

Abbreviated MDRD equation

+5.04 [0 to +138]

 

p < 0.05

 

Mayo Clinic Quadratic equation

+4.74 [0 to +53]

 

p < 0.05