Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for:

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Vassalotti
16 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yon Su Kim
19 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Giuseppe Quintaliani
Resubmission - Version 2
19 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Vassalotti
28 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Giuseppe Quintaliani
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Vassalotti
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Giuseppe Quintaliani
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
27 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Giuseppe Quintaliani
Resubmission - Version 9
27 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
1 Sep 2009 Editorially accepted
1 Sep 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2369-10-24

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement