Skip to main content

Table 2 GFR according to different equations (n = 5526)

From: The impact of different GFR estimating equations on the prevalence of CKD and risk groups in a Southeast Asian cohort using the new KDIGO guidelines

Equation

(N)

All

(5526)

Males

(4121)

Females

(1405)

S-MDRD

72.6

(72.1-73.0)

71.7

(71.1-72.2)

75.2

(74.2-76.2)

CKD-EPI

79.4

(78.9-79.8)

77.9

(77.3-78.3)

84.0

(83.0-84.9)

J-EPI

64.6

(64.2-65.0)

63.4

(62.9-63.8)

68.3

(67.7-69.1)

C-MDRD

89.6

(89.1-90.2)

88.6

(87.9-89.2)

92.9

(91.7-94.1)

T-GFR

82.4

(83.3-82.9)

84.5

(84.0-85.0)

78.0

(77.2-78.8)

  1. Data shown as mean (95% CI) in ml/min/1,73 m2.
  2. eGFR by using one equation was different from eGFR by
  3. all other equations (p < 0.001) for all, males and females
  4. CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration
  5. S-MDRD, standard MDRD; C-MDRD, Chinese MDRD; J-EPI, Japanese CKD-EPI; T-GFR, Thai GFR.
Back to article page

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us