Table 1 Patients demographics
Parameter | Sixtiles of convective volume prescription | Anova | Dunnett Post Hoc Test | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 | P<0.05 | P>0.05 | ||
Patients [count] | 23 | 25 | 22 | 29 | 27 | 28 | |||
Treatments [count] | 379 | 382 | 377 | 382 | 380 | 376 | |||
Age [Years] | 43.4 ± 15 | 44.5 ± 16 | 48.2 ± 11 | 43.2 ± 16 | 46.3 ± 14 | 48.9 ± 12 | NS | None | 1 vs. 2-6 |
Gender Female [count [%]] | 11 [47.8%] | 12 [48%] | 10 [45.5%] | 14 [48%] | 12 [44%] | 11 [39%] | NS | Chi Square Test | |
Pre HDF Weight [Kg] | 63.8 ±13.0 | 61.6 ±12.5 | 61.4 ±13.0 | 61.0 ±12.8 | 60.5 ±12.7 | 60.8 ±15.3 | NS | None | 1 vs. 2-6 |
Post HDF Weight [Kg] | 61.4 ± 13.0 | 58.5 ± 12.2 | 58.7 ± 13.1 | 58.2 ± 12.8 | 57.9 ± 12.6 | 59.4 ± 13.0 | NS | None | 1 vs. 2-6 |
Temperature pre HDF [Celsius] | 36.72 ± 0.36 | 36.55 ± 0.45 | 36.56 ± 0.42 | 36.54 ± 0.41 | 36.55 ± 0.43 | 36.55 ± 0.42 | NS | None | 1 vs. 2-6 |
Temperature post HDF [Celsius] | 36.98 ± 0.39 | 36.81 ± 0.50 | 36.84 ± 0.48 | 36.85 ± 0.39 | 36.85 ± 0.39 | 36.82 ± 0.38 | NS | None | 1 vs. 2-6 |
Delta Temperature [Celsius] | 0.27 ± 0.29 | 0.27 ± 0.38 | 0.28 ± 0.37 | 0.30 ± 0.29 | 0.28 ± 0.27 | 0.28 ± 0.28 | NS | None | 1 vs. 2-6 |
Interdialytic Weight Gain [% post HDF target weight] | 4.2 ± 2.0 | 5.2 ± 2.1 | 4.8 ± 2.5 | 5.0 ± 2.3 | 4.6 ± 2.2 | 4.0 ± 2.1 | <0.0001 | 1 vs. 2-4 | 1 vs. 5-6 |
Pre HDF Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg] | 136 ± 29 | 147 ± 28 | 143 ± 28 | 139 ± 27 | 137 ± 26 | 136 ± 26 | <0.0001 | 1 vs. 2-3 | 1 vs. 4-6 |
Pre HDF Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg] | 70 ± 20 | 77 ± 21 | 75 ± 22 | 75 ± 23 | 71 ± 22 | 69 ± 21 | <0.0001 | 1 vs. 2-4 | 1 vs. 5,6 |
Pre HDF MAP Blood Pressure [mmHg] | 93 ± 23 | 102 ± 23 | 99 ± 23 | 98 ± 23 | 95 ± 22 | 93 ± 22 | <0.0001 | 1 vs. 2-4 | 1 vs5,6 |
Pre HDF Pulse Rate [bpm] | 94 ± 15 | 93 ± 16 | 94 ± 18 | 95 ± 15 | 94 ± 16 | 94 ± 16 | NS | None | 1 vs.2-6 |