Skip to main content

Table 7 Ultrafiltration rate by time

From: Association of intradialytic hypotension and convective volume in hemodiafiltration: results from a retrospective cohort study

 

Groups

Dunett Test

1

2

3

4

5

6

Total

Anova

P < 0.05

P > 0.05

UF rate 15 min (mL/min)

20 ± 14

23 ± 17

22 ± 17

26 ± 24

23 ± 20

23 ± 22

23 ± 19

<0.001

1 vs. 4.

1 vs 2,3,5,6

UF rate 30 min (mL/min)

20 ± 8

23 ± 9

21 ± 9

22 ± 9

20 ± 8

17 ± 8

20 ± 9

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 45 min (mL/min)

18 ± 8

21 ± 8

19 ± 8

20 ± 9

18 ± 7

16 ± 8

19 ± 8

<0.0001

1 vs 2,4.

1 vs 3,5,6.

UF rate 60 min (mL/min)

16 ± 6

18 ± 8

17 ± 8

18 ± 7

17 ± 9

15 ± 6

17 ± 7

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 75 min (mL/min)

14 ± 6

17 ± 6

15 ± 6

16 ± 6

15 ± 6

13 ± 6

15 ± 6

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 90 min (mL/min)

12 ± 5

15 ± 6

14 ± 6

14 ± 5

13 ± 5

12 ± 5

13 ± 5

<0.0001

1 vs 2–5.

1 vs 6.

UF rate 105 min (mL/min)

11 ± 6

13 ± 6

13 ± 5

12 ± 5

12 ± 5

11 ± 4

12 ± 5

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 120 min (mL/min)

10 ± 6

13 ± 6

12 ± 5

11 ± 5

11 ± 5

10 ± 4

11 ± 5

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 135 min (mL/min)

10 ± 5

12 ± 5

11 ± 5

11 ± 5

10 ± 4

9 ± 4

10 ± 5

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 150 min (mL/min)

9 ± 6

11 ± 6

10 ± 5

10 ± 5

9 ± 4

8 ± 4

9 ± 5

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UR rate 165 min (mL/min)

8 ± 5

10 ± 5

9 ± 5

9 ± 5

8 ± 4

7 ± 4

9 ± 5

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 180 min (mL/min)

8 ± 9

11 ± 9

10 ± 9

10 ± 10

8 ± 7

7 ± 5

9 ± 8

<0.0001

1 vs 2–4.

1 vs 5,6.

UF rate 210 min (mL/min)

9 ± 22

15 ± 22

11 ± 14

10 ± 9

10 ± 25

7 ± 8

10 ± 16

<0.0001

1 vs 2.

1 vs 3–6.

  1. The groups of convective volume were defined as follows: Group 1: 0 to 0.2 liters. Group 2: 0.3 to 7.53 liters, Group 3: 7.54 to 14.8 liters; Group 4: 14.9 to 16.96 liters; Group 5: 16.97 to 18.9 liters; Group 6: 19.1 to 21 liters, and Group 7: 21.1 to 30 liters.