Skip to main content

Table 2 Implication for CKD staging when an enzymatic or a standardized serumcreatinine is used

From: Clinical evaluation of analytical variations in serum creatinine measurements: why laboratories should abandon Jaffe techniques

  

MDRD enzymatic p10/ p90

  

<30 ml/min/1.73 m2

30-45 ml/min/1.73 m2

45-60 ml/min/1.73 m2

60-90 ml/min/1.73 m2

>90 ml/min/1.73 m2

Total

  

p10

p90

p10

p90

p10

p90

p10

p90

p10

p90

 

MDRD standardized

<30 ml/min/1.73 m2

2483 (97.6%)

2543 (100%)

60 (2.4%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2543

 

30-45 ml/min/1.73 m2

0 (0%)

141 (3.6%)

3299 (84.4%)

3768 (96.4%)

610 (15.6%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3909

 

45-60 ml/min/1.73 m2

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

338 (4.1%)

5740 (69.9%)

7878 (95.9%)

2476 (30.1%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

8216

 

60-90 ml/min/1.73 m2

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

845 (2.1%)

28308 (71.1%)

38976 (97.9%)

11513 (28.9%)

0 (%)

39821

 

>90 ml/min/1.73 m2

5 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1502 (5.4%)

27930 (100%)

26433 (94.6%)

27935

  

2488

2684

3359

4106

6350

8723

30784

40478

39443

26433

82424

  1. Crosstabulation showing the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) stages when the modification of diet in renal disease equation (MDRD) is calculated with a standardized serumcreatinine versus a serumcreatinine as measured by a p10 (10th percentile) or a p90 (90th percentile) laboratory using an enzymatic technique.