Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation?: Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evangelos Mazaris
16 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - silas p norman
8 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Geddes
30 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Michael Clark
Resubmission - Version 2
30 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evangelos Mazaris
14 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Geddes
23 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - silas p norman
26 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Michael Clark
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2369-13-152

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement