Setting an agenda for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews in CKD care
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Deidra Crews|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katrin Uhlig|
|16 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allison Tong|
|20 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - hugh gallagher|
|27 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Deidra Crews|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|1 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2369-13-74|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.