Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for:

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Takashi Iwakiri
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonietta Gigante
15 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leal Herlitz
15 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arda Goceroglu
29 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Takashi Iwakiri
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leal Herlitz
25 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arda Goceroglu
12 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Takashi Iwakiri
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arda Goceroglu
30 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Takashi Iwakiri
Resubmission - Version 5
30 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
17 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2369-14-125

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement