Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of patients receiving ESA therapy before and after the March 2007FDA black box warning

From: Influence of safety warnings on ESA prescribing among dialysis patients using an interrupted time series

 

Entire study period

Base period

Follow up

P-value*

Number of patients months

13,748,238

6,702,212

7,046,026

 
 

%

%

%

 

Age (Year)

   

<.0001

  18–44

13.5

13.6

13.4

 

  45–64

37.9

37.1

38.6

 

  ≥65

48.6

49.3

48.0

 

Race

   

0.329

  White

54.6

54.6

54.6

 

  Non-white

45.4

45.4

45.4

 

Gender

   

<.0001

  Male

53.7

53.4

53.9

 

  Female

46.3

46.6

46.1

 

Duration of dialysis

   

<.0001

  <12 months

20.3

21.2

19.5

 

  12– < 36 months

29.5

29.9

29.2

 

  ≥36 months

50.1

48.9

51.3

 

Diabetes co-morbidity

   

<.0001

  Diabetic

44.3

44.0

44.6

 

  Non-diabetic

55.7

56.0

55.4

 

Facility profit status

   

<.0001

  For-profit

81.2

80.5

82.0

 

Non-profit

18.8

19.5

18.0

 

Facility chain status

   

<.0001

  Chain 1 (FP)

27.0

26.9

27.0

 

  Chain 2 (FP)

30.4

26.8

33.9

 

  Chain 3 (NP)

4.0

4.1

3.9

 

  Medium chain

10.8

13.0

8.8

 

  Small/non chains

17.8

18.7

16.9

 

  Hospital-based (NP)

10.0

10.6

9.5

 

Hematocrit value#

   

<.0001

  <30%

8.4

7.4

9.4

 

  30– < 36%

45.7

41.6

49.8

 

  ≥36%

45.9

51.0

40.8

 
  1. Notes: FP For-profit, NP Nonprofit.
  2. Base period from September 2004 to February 2007. Followup MArch 2007 to August 2009.
  3. FDA black box warning was issuedin March 2007.
  4. #Patients months with missing hematocrit values are not included (when dose is withheld).
  5. *P-value for Pearson’s chi-square test based on the difference between pre and post FDA warning period.