Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Adjunctive treatment with moxonidine versus nitrendipine for hypertensive patients with advanced renal failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Aug 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Palmer
22 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Afschin Gandjour
29 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Kavi Littlewood
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Kavi Littlewood
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Afschin Gandjour
10 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Walley
14 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Kavi Littlewood
Resubmission - Version 4
14 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Walley
9 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Kavi Littlewood
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Kavi Littlewood
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Jul 2007 Editorially accepted
24 Jul 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2369-8-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement