Skip to main content

Table 4 Training group: Correlations, bias, precision and accuracy of the different GFR prediction methods and measured 24hU-CrCl

From: Quantification of excretory renal function and urinary protein excretion by determination of body cell mass using bioimpedance analysis

  

Correlation coefficient R

SEE

BIAS Median difference

ABSOLUTE BIAS

PRECISION IQR (P25,P75) of differences

ACCURACY

P15 (%)

P30 (%)

All subjects (N = 60)

mCrCl

0.970***

8.7

7.4

8.5

16.4 (1.1, 17.5)

48 (80)a

56 (93)bcd

4vMDRD

0.930***

13.1

−11.7

12.10

13.6 (-19.6, -5.9)

15 (25)

37 (62)

CKD-EPI

0.950***

10.7

−10.2

10.4

10.6 (-15.5, -4.9)

21 (35)

45 (75)

CG-CrCl

0.840***

19.3

−4.4

9.2

14.2 (-11.2, 3.0)

26 (43)

51 (85)

  1. ***p < 0.001
  2. displayed in mL/min/1.73 m2;
  3. ap < 0.001 vs the three other methods; bp = 0.001 vs 4vMDRD; cp < 0.05 vs CKD-EPI; dp = 0.18 vs CG