Fig. 5From: Comparison between urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and urine protein dipstick testing for prevalence and ability to predict the risk for chronic kidney disease in the general population (Iwate-KENCO study): a prospective community-based cohort studyReclassification analysis. Changes in risk stratification capacity derived from reclassification tables in terms of dipstick-based CKD risk grades vs. UACR-based CKD risk grades. For comparison with the dipstick-based model, the percentage of risk grades 3–4 in the events group increased (from 20 to 49 %) in the UACR-based model. NRI: Net Reclassification Improvement; IDI: Integrated Discrimination ImprovementBack to article page