Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic, clinical and laboratorial variables of 605 maintenance hemodialysis patients from four outpatient dialysis units in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, stratified by HTLV-1 serology

From: Prevalence and risk factors for Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1) among maintenance hemodialysis patients

Independent variables

HTLV (+)

N = 15

HTLV (−)

N = 590

POR

(95% CI)

p

Demographic

 Age, years

52.5 (46.9–71.0)

47.8 (37.7–59.0)

1.03 (1.00–1.07)

0.080

 Female (vs. male)

8/15 (53.3)

224/590 (38.0)

1.87 (0.67–5.22)

0.234

 Non-white (vs. white)

13/15 (86.7)

513/590 (86.9)

1.03 (0.23–4.63)

0.974

 Poor or very poor (vs. classes A thru C)

10/15 (66.7)

265/580 (45.7)

2.38 (0.80–7.04)

0.118

 Less than high school (vs. high school or greater)

12/15 (80.0)

359/589 (61.0)

2.56 (0.72–9.18)

0.148

 Unmarried (vs. married)

11/15 (73.3)

261/588 (44.4)

3.45 (1.09–10.95)

0.036

Clinical

 Dialysis by catheter (vs. AV fistula)

4/15 (26.7)

76/588 (12.9)

1.12 (0.31–4.02)

0.867

 Time on MHD, months

20.4 (4.5–58.4)

47.8 (19.6–97.4)

0.99 (0.97–1.00)

0.064

 EPO, IU (x103)/week

12 (6–12)

10 (6–12)

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.870

 Diabetes mellitus (vs. no)

5/15 (33.3)

100/590 (16.9)

2.45 (0.82–7.32)

0.109

 Systemic hypertension (vs. no)

13/15 (86.7)

533/590 (90.3)

0.70 (0.15–3.16)

0.638

 Blood transfusion (vs. no)

4/15 (26.7)

55/582 (9.2)

3.48 (1.07–11.31)

0.038

 Hepatitis B (vs. no)

1/15 (6.7)

11/589 (1.9)

3.75 (0.45–31.10)

0.220

 Hepatitis C (vs. no)

1/15 (6.7)

18/590 (3.1)

2.27 (0.28–18.21)

0.440

 Hepatitis B or C (vs. no)

2/15 (13.3)

28/589 (4.8)

3.08 (0.66–14.33)

0.151

  1. Continuous data (Age, Time on MHD and EPO dose) are expressed as median (P25–P75%); categorical data are expressed as n/total (%); POR Prevalence Odds Ratio, EPO Erythropoietin, MHD maintenance hemodialysis. For continuous data, POR reflects the odds of a positive HTLV serology with each increase in one unit of the continuous variable (one year for Age, one month for Time on MHD, and 103 IU/week for EPO); for categorical data, POR reflects the odds of a positive HTLV serology in the variable of interest compared to its complement. History of blood transfusion was limited to available data that reported transfusion only for the previous three months. P values in bold highlight the variables that were selected for the multivariable logistic regression model. Although a positive serology for Hepatitis B was associated with a p ≤ 0.25, it was not included in the multivariable model because we preferred to use the variable Hepatitis B or C