Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of CKD patients meeting an indication for referral who were seen by a nephrologist in 2013 and projected new referrals

From: Evaluating the feasibility of the KDIGO CKD referral recommendations

Characteristic

All patients with CKD meeting an indication for referral

Met indication and seen by nephrologist

Met indication and not seen by nephrologist (“projected new referral”)

P-value*

No. of patients

2851

611

2240

Age in years, mean (SD)

70.2 (12.7)

66.8 (13.8)

71.1 (12.2)

< 0.001***

Female, n (%)

1798 (63.1%)

349 (57.1%)

1449 (64.7%)

< 0.001****

Race

 Caucasian

 Black

 Hispanic

 Asian

 Other

1648 (57.8%)

539 (18.9%)

465 (16.3%)

63 (2.2%)

136 (4.8%)

291 (47.6%)

175 (28.6%)

105 (17.2%)

21 (3.4%)

19 (3.1%)

1357 (60.6%)

364 (16.3%)

360 (16.1%)

42 (1.9%)

117 (5.2%)

< 0.001****

Baseline eGFR, ml/min/1.73m2

  ≥ 90

 60–89

 30–59

 15–29

  < 15

 Not available **

147 (5.2%)

749 (26.3%)

1446 (50.7%)

233 (8.2%)

119 (4.2%)

157 (5.5%)

22 (3.6%)

72 (11.8%)

259 (42.4%)

130 (21.3%)

110 (18.0%)

18 (2.9%)

125 (5.6%)

677 (30.2%)

1187 (53.0%)

103 (5.6%)

9 (0.4%)

139 (6.2%)

< 0.001*****

Urine microalbumin to creatinine ratio, μg/mg, median (IQR)

41.5 (IQR [0,233.8])

133.5 (IQR [22.2,842.2])

29.1 (IQR [0,108.7])

< 0.001*****

  1. Baseline eGFR is calculated based on the first available creatinine result in 2013
  2. * p-value comparing characteristics for individuals seen and not seen by a nephrologist
  3. ** eGFR was not required to define CKD for individuals with persistent albuminuria
  4. *** Welch’s two-sample T-test
  5. **** Χ2 test
  6. ***** Wilcoxon rank sum test