This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 May 2017
Accepted: 26 September 2017
Published: 11 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ahsan Alam|
|26 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Gander|
|22 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jeannie Devitt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jeannie Devitt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12882-017-0726-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.