This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Exploring the use of tablet computer-based electronic data capture system to assess patient reported measures among patients with chronic kidney disease: a pilot study
- Dorothy Wong†1,
- Shen Cao†1,
- Heather Ford1,
- Candice Richardson1,
- Dmitri Belenko1,
- Evan Tang1,
- Luca Ugenti1,
- Eleanor Warsmann1,
- Amanda Sissons1,
- Yalinie Kulandaivelu1,
- Nathaniel Edwards1,
- Marta Novak2,
- Madeline Li3 and
- Istvan Mucsi1, 4Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 June 2017
Accepted: 21 November 2017
Published: 6 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oomen John|
|10 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neville Dossabhoy|
|18 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kwek Jia Liang|
|19 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dorothy Wong|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dorothy Wong|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12882-017-0771-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.