BMC Nephrology

Table 1 Characteristics of the Donors and Recipients

From: Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: comparison of two kidney preservation protocols on graft outcomes

	ISP	NR	p
Donors	n = 22	n = 24
Age, yr	41.8 ± 10.1	43.2 ± 8.6	0.61^a
Male, n (%)	32 (100)	27 (84)	0.05^b
Blood type, n (%)			0.10^b
A	19 (59.4)	16 (50.0)
B	5 (15.6)	1 (3.1)
AB	0 (0.0)	2 (6.3)
O	8 (25.0)	13 (40.6)
Serum creatinine	144.1 ± 44	130.3 ± 36	0.32^a
eGFR (MDRD)	55.1 ± 20.7	58.1 ± 19.7	0.57^a
No flow duration, min	10 ± 5	10 ± 10	0.38^a
Low flow duration, min	118 ± 14	123 ± 20	0.16^a
Recipients	n = 32	n = 32
Age, yr	45.8 ± 11.1	47.9 ± 10.7	0.52^a
Male, n (%)	25 (78)	24 (75)	0.77^c
Diabetes, n (%)	1 (3)	3 (9)	0.61^b
Blood type, n (%)			0.26^b
A	19 (59.4)	14 (43.8)
B	4 (12.5)	2 (6.3)
AB	1 (3.1)	4 (12.5)
O	8 (25.0)	12 (37.5)
Waiting time on list >950 days, n (%)	26 (83.9)	24 (75.0)	0.38^a
Cold ischemia, min	1027 ± 250	817 ± 211	0.001^a
NR or ISP duration, min	165 ± 44	203 ± 46	0.001^a
ABDR mismatch	4.1 ± 1.1	4.8 ± 1.2	0.04^a

Continuous data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
ISP in situ perfusion, NR normothermic recirculation, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate
^aWilcoxon test
^bFisher exact test
^cChi square

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcnephrology@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com