Skip to main content

Table 3 Graft Rejection and Histological Assessment

From: Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: comparison of two kidney preservation protocols on graft outcomes

 

ISP

n = 32

NR

n = 32

p

M3 Fibrosis, Mean ± SD

0.31 ± 0.09

0.32 ± 0.14

0.68d

  Missing, n

14

16

 

M12 Fibrosis, Mean ± SD

0.37 ± 0.12

0.30 ± 0.10

0.08a

  Missing, n

16

16

 

Clinical acute rejection, n (%)

6 (19)

5 (18)

0.93c

  Missing, n

1

5

 

Borderline changes

   

 M3, n (%)

10 (45)

4 (21)

0.10c

  Missing, n

10

13

 

 M12, n (%)

13 (68)

4 (22)

0.008b

  Missing, n

13

14

 

cv score M3, n (%)

  

0.83b

 0

5 (25)

5 (33)

 

 1

11 (55)

6 (40)

 

 2

2 (10)

3 (20)

 

 3

2 (10)

1 (7)

 

  Missing, n

12

17

 

cv score M12, n (%)

  

0.39b

 0

5 (26)

8 (44)

 

 1

12 (63)

6 (33)

 

 2

1 (5)

2 (11)

 

 3

1 (5)

2(11)

 

  Missing, n

13

14

 
  1. ISP in situ perfusion, NR normothermic recirculation
  2. aWilcoxon test
  3. bFisher exact test
  4. cChi square
  5. dStudent test
Back to article page

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us