Skip to main content

Table 3 Acceptability of CPR-VDA

From: Evaluation of the CPR video decision aid with patients with end stage renal disease

 

Patient n = 49

Pre

Post

p-value

Relevance of the CPR decision M (range, SD) (Not relevant 0–1–2-3-4 Very relevant)

2.1 (0–4, 1.1)

2.3 (0–4, 1.1)

0.01

Item

Patient n = 49 n (%)

Family n = 8 n (%)

“How would you rate the CPR video decision aid?”

 Poor

0

0

 Fair

1 (2%)

0

 Good

19 (38%)

3 (37.5%)

 Very good

20 (40.8%)

4 (50%)

 Excellent

9 (18.4%)

1 (12.5%)

“How would you rate the amount of information in the video?”

 Much less than I needed

0

0

 A little less than I needed

4 (8.2%)

0

 About the right amount

37 (75.5%)

7 (87.5%)

 A little more than I needed

6 (12.2%)

0

 A lot more than I needed

2 (4.1%)

1 (12.5%)

“How balanced was the video’s information about CPR?”

 Clearly slanted towards having CPR

4 (8.2%)

0

 A little slanted towards having CPR

4 (8.2%)

1 (12.5%)

 Completely balanced

38 (77.6%)

5 (62.5%)

 A little slanted towards not having CPR

3 (6.1%)

2 (25%)

 Clearly slanted towards not having CPR

0

0

“How clear was the information in the video?”

 Everything was clear

29 (59.2%)

7 (87.5%)

 Most things were clear

17 (34.7%)

0

 Some things were clear

2 (4.1%)

1 (12.5%)

 Many things were unclear

1 (2%)

0

“How helpful was the video in helping you make decisions about CPR?”

 Very helpful

28 (57.1%)

4 (50%)

 Somewhat helpful

16 (32.7%)

3 (37.5%)

 A little helpful

5 (10.2%)

0

 Not helpful

0

1 (12.5%)

“Would you recommend this video to other people who are considering CPR?”

 I would definitely recommend it

40 (81.6%)

6 (75%)

 I would probably recommend it

8 (16.3%)

2 (25%)

 I would probably not recommend it

1 (2%)

0

 I would definitely not recommend

0

0