Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariable repeated measures logistic regression modelling for first-time cannulation success

From: Variables associated with successful vascular access cannulation in hemodialysis patients: a prospective cohort study

Variable

Univariable OR (95% CI)

p-value

Patient variables

 Patient age

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

0.19

 Patient gender

  Male

1.09 (0.68–1.76)

0.72

  Female

1

 

 BMI

0.95 (0.95–1.01)

0.12

 Steroids

  No

1.65 (0.61–4.44)

0.32

  Yes

1

 

 PAI

  No

0.83 (0.32–2.11)

0.69

  Yes

1

 

 Diabetes

  No

1.02 (0.64–1.63)

0.94

  Yes

1

 

 PVD

  No

0.89 (0.53–1.49)

0.65

  Yes

1

 

 Heart disease

  No

1.05 (0.66–1.68)

0.84

  Yes

1

 

 Hypertension

  No

1.73 (0.91–3.29)

0.09

  Yes

1

 

 Hypotension

  No

0.76 (0.32–1.81)

0.54

  Yes

1

 

 Smoker

  No

0.58 (0.14–2.36)

0.44

  Yes

1

 

 Log age of access

2.01 (1.65–2.46)

< 0.001

 AV type

  Fistula

3.22 (1.79–5.80)

< 0.001

  Graft

1

 

 AVF location

 

0.82

  Brachio-cephalic

1.20 (0.45–3.19)

0.72

  Radio-cephalic

1.35 (0.50–3.68)

0.59

  Brachio-basilic

1

 

 Surgical revision <3mths

  No

1.71 (0.90–3.25)

0.10

  Yes

1

 

 Depth of AVF

 

< 0.001

  Superficial

15.0 (5.64–40.0)

< 0.001

  Palpable

11.3 (4.34–29.4)

< 0.001

  Non-palpable

1

 

 Vessel

  Straight

1.01 (0.59–1.72)

0.98

  Zig-zag

1

 

vBifurcation

 

0.21

  Nil

0.58 (0.23–1.45)

0.71

  Single

0.91 (0.33–2.49)

0.86

  Multiple

1

 

 Aneurysm

  

  Yes

2.64 (1.34–5.18)

0.005

  No

1

 

Episodes of cannulation variables

 Log nurse confidence

1.19 (1.01–1.40)

0.03

 Length of vessel

1.00 (0.94–1.06)

0.87

 Bruit present – indicates stenosis

  No

0.71 (0.30–1.65)

0.42

  Yes

1

 

 Stent in situ

  

  No

3.17 (1.32–7.61)

0.01

  Yes

1

 

 Oedema present

  

  No

3.22 (1.40–7.38)

0.006

  Yes

1

 

 Bruising present

  No

2.42 (1.39–4.19)

0.002

  Yes

1

 

 Hematoma present

  No

2.46 (1.02–5.90)

0.04

  Yes

1

 

 AVF soft with tendency for extravasation

  No

1.32 (0.74–2.36)

0.35

  Yes

1

 

 Tourniquet use

  

  No

1.25 (0.76–2.07)

0.37

  Yes

1

 

 Ultrasound use

  No

13.9 (8.18–23.6)

< 0.001

  Yes

1

 

 Standard needle length

  No

2.56 (0.35–18.8)

0.36

  Yes

1

 

 Arterial needle antegrade insertion

  No

1.76 (0.92–3.79)

0.09

  Yes

1

 

 Arterial needle bevel up

  No

0.68 (0.40–1.14)

0.14

  Yes

1

 

 Arterial needle rotated after insertion

  No

0.57 (0.36–0.91)

0.02

  Yes

1

 

 Venous needle bevel up

  No

0.64 (0.37–1.10)

0.10

  Yes

1

 

 Venous needle rotated after insertion

  No

0.74 (0.45–1.23)

0.25

  Yes

1

 

 Arterial needle gauge

 

0.66

  14

2.78 (0.30–25.7)

0.37

  15

2.03 (0.26–16.0)

0.50

  16

1.52 (0.17–13.6)

0.70

  17

1

 

 Venous needle gauge

 

0.10

  14

7.65 (1.40–41.6)

0.02

  15

4.58 (1.12–18.8)

0.03

  16

3.39 (0.71–16.1)

0.13

  17

1

 

Nurse variables

 Nurse age

0.99 (0.96–1.02)

0.41

 Years as a RN

0.98 (0.96–1.00)

0.09

 Years as HD nurse

0.98 (0.96–1.01)

0.29

 Gender

  Male

4.88 (1.42–16.7)

0.01

  Female

1

 

 Employment status

  Fulltime

1.32 (0.83–2.09)

0.25

  Part time/casual

1

 

 Job Title

  RN

1.16 (0.66–2.02)

0.61

  CN / SDN

1

 

 Highest education

  BN/RN

1.13 (0.66–1.94)

0.66

  Graduate or higher

1

 

 Postgrad in renal nursing

  No

1.84 (1.15–2.93)

0.01

  Yes

1

 
  1. OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, BMI Body mass index, PAI Platelet aggregate inhibitor, PVD Peripheral vascular disease, AV Arteriovenous, AVF Arteriovenous fistula, RN Registered nurse, HD Hemodialysis, CN Clinical nurse, SDN Staff development nurse, BN Bachelors of nursing
  2. There were no missed cannulation from the following variables; therefore, they were removed from the model: AVG location lower arm, immunosuppressant, anticoagulant, local anaesthetic, and cannulation technique
  3. Current stenosis and bruit were highly correlated; therefore, removed current stenosis from the model
  4. No male nurse had ‘post-graduate certificate in renal nursing’; therefore, ‘male nurse’ was removed from the model