From: Cost of dialysis therapies in rural and remote Australia – a micro-costing analysis
Dialysis Model | Description | Characteristics | Access Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
DxMoC1 Urban staffed service (Hub and non-hub) | Both services provide maintenance haemodialysis; Hub service also supports pre-dialysis care and training and support for self-care therapies. | Larger facilities in urban areas; default service when others at capacity; for complex patient issues. | No criteria: all patients commence treatment here while waiting training or space in more remote unit. |
DxMoC2 Rural staffed service | Maintenance haemodialysis; some support for self-care patients. 350-500 km from hub by road. | Smaller more distant facilities; often co-located with local hospitals to access support services. | Criteria: stable patients adhering to treatment; usually a waiting list. |
DxMoC3 Remote staffed service (Government) | Maintenance haemodialysis; some support for self-care patients. 80 km by air from hub | Small units very distant from hub. | Criteria: patients clinically well, physically mobile, adherent with treatment. Issues with local recruitment. FIFO staff model |
DxMoC4 Remote staffed services (Purple House) | Maintenance dialysis in home community with social supports. 80 – 1000 km from hub service | Aboriginal owned and community driven services; small units in remote areas; permanent and respite services to select (local) patients. | Criteria: Patient acceptance criteria less restrictive as more support services available. Rotating staff model |
DxMoC5 Self-care dialysis | Training and support for self-care dialysis. Modalities include haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. | Very small dedicated multi-user facilities established for self-care haemodialysis in remote areas. Peritoneal dialysis attended at home. | Criteria: clinically stable, deemed competent and safe to deliver own care. Maintenance of equipment and facilities and assistance with in-community deliveries can be a challenge. |