Skip to main content

Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of each definition for graft loss for recipients of DCD kidney transplants

From: Prediction of kidney transplant outcome based on different DGF definitions in Chinese deceased donation

 

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Accuracy (% [95% CI])

GL

 Shoskes DGF

47.2

89.6

78.2 (73.8,82.1)

 Boom DGF

50.9

84.6

75.3 (70.6,79.4)

 Classical DGF

63.6

81.9

75.3 (70.6,79.4)

 New model

71.7

78.6

73.4 (68.7,77.6)

 Turk DGF

74.5

71.6

68.3 (63.4,72.8)

 Nick DGF

69.8

69.8

65.6 (60.6,70.2)

 Giral DGF

64.0

65.9

59.7 (64.5,54.6)

Death-censored GL

 New model

59.4

90.1

83.3 (79.2,86.8)

 Classical DGF

57.6

89.72

82.5 (78.3,86.0)

 Turk DGF

66.7

82.5

77.2 (72.6,81.1)

 Boom DGF

57.6

81.6

75.3 (70.6,79.4)

 Shoskes DGF

75.0

69.6

65.9 (60.9,70.5)

 Nick DGF

80.6

66.6

64.0 (59.0,68.7)

 Giral DGF

80.0

61.6

57.5 (52.5,62.4)

  1. New model, Classical DGF combined with 48-h creatinine reduction ratio