Accuracy and concordance of measurement methods to assess non-adherence after renal transplantation - a prospective study

Table 4 Linear regression analysis

Dependent Variable	Parameter	B	95% CI	p	R²
TA (Total)	Constant	94.172	87.642, 102.299	.000	.150
	Age	−.011	−.032, .014	.396
	Sex	.129	−.272, .525	.546
	CV%	−.006	−.021, .014	.432
	Physician‘s estimates (VAS)	.038	−.041, .103	.415
	Self-report (VAS)	.027	−.001, .041	.011*
TM ± 2 h (Total)	Constant	88.732	74.577, 107.131	.000	.143
	Age	−.019	−.063, .027	.404
	Sex	−.171	−1.026, .680	.701
	CV%	−.022	−.060, .011	.178
	Physician‘s estimates (VAS)	.052	−.119, .182	.567
	Self-report (VAS)	.071	.017, .125	.006*
TM ± 30 min (Total)	Constant	49.713	−4.291, 120.920	.183	.199
	Age	−.085	−.244, .066	.297
	Sex	−.888	−3.854, 1.865	.556
	CV%	.033	−.106, .162	.580
	Physician‘s estimates (VAS)	.215	−.469, .783	.607
	Self-report (VAS)	.313	.124, .443	.001*

Note: estimates are based on 10,000 Bootstrap-samples, * p < .05, TA = Taking Adherence, TM + -2 h = Timing Adherence + − 2 h,
TM + -30 min = Timing Adherence, CV% = Coefficient of variability, PE = Physicians’ estimates, SR = self-report, VAS = Visual Analogue Scale.

ISSN: 1471-2369