Skip to main content

Table 2 Incidence of ESRD with TUG categories

From: Association between physical performance and incidence of end-stage renal disease in older adults: a national wide cohort study

TUG Subjects ESRD incidence Incidence ratea Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Competing risk model
< 10 1,159,126 2732 0.47 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
≥10 393,655 1206 0.59 1.21 (1.13–1.33) 1.25 (1.16–1.33) 1.10 (1.02–1.17) 1.09 (1.12–1.17) 1.07 (1.00–1.15)
< 10 1,159,126 2732 0.47 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
10–14.9 340,276 984 0.55 1.15 (1.07–1.24) 1.18 (1.10–1.27) 1.07 (0.99–1.15) 1.07 (1.00–1.16) 1.07 (0.99–1.15)
15–19.9 45,684 177 0.71 1.46 (1.25–1.69) 1.51 (1.29–1.75) 1.19 (1.02–1.38) 1.11 (0.96–1.30) 1.08 (0.92–1.26)
≥20 7695 45 1.10 2.25 (1.68–3.02) 2.34 (1.74–3.14) 1.47 (1.10–1.98) 1.45 (1.08–1.95) 1.25 (0.91–1.73)
  1. Model 1: crude model; Model 2: adjusting for sex, smoking status, alcohol history, exercise level, and income; Model 3: adjusting for variables of Model 2 with BMI, DM, HT, dyslipidemia, and eGFR; Model 4: adjusting for variables of Model 3 and state of dipstick proteinuria (4 categories); Competing risk model: adjusting for variables in Model 4 and considering competing risk
  2. BMI body mass index, DM diabetes mellitus, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, ESRD end-stage renal disease, HT hypertension, TUG timed up-and-go test
  3. aPer 1000 people