Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate regression for the effect of catheter placement method on catheter migration

From: Association between different peritoneal dialysis catheter placement methods and short‐term postoperative complications

Exposure

Non-adjusted

 

Adjust I

 

Adjust II

 

Catheter placement method

OR (95 %CI)

P-value

OR (95 %CI)

P-value

OR (95 %CI)

P-value

Open surgery

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

 

Seldinger technique

1.715 (0.669, 4.396)

0.262

1.456 (0.543, 3.906)

0.456

1.061 (0.308, 3.649)

0.926

Modified Seldinger technique

0.276 (0.061, 1.257)

0.096

0.247 (0.051, 1.198)

0.083

0.161 (0.027, 0.961)

0.045

  1. Data in the table: OR (95 % CI) P-value;
  2. Non-adjusted model adjusts for: gender, age;
  3. Adjust I model adjust for: gender, age, systolic pressure, history of abdominal and pelvic surgery, creatinine;
  4. Adjust II model adjust for: gender, age, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, diabetes, hypertension, history of glomerulonephritis, history of ischemic heart disease, history of abdominal and pelvic surgery, hemoglobin, urea nitrogen, creatinine, duration of catheter placement procedure (min)
Back to article page

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us