Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of bias and accuracy between eGFRs and mGFR in different BMI groups

From: Choosing an appropriate glomerular filtration rate estimating equation: role of body mass index

BMI

Total

< 25%

25–75%

> 75%

Equation

Bias

(mL/min/1.73 m2) (eGFR, 95% CI)

30%

accuracy

Bias

(mL/min/1.73 m2) (eGFR, 95% CI)

30%

accuracy

Bias

(mL/min/1.73 m2) (eGFR, 95% CI)

30%

accuracy

Bias

(mL/min/1.73 m2) (eGFR, 95% CI)

30%

accuracy

eGFREPI_Cr_2009

−4.2(− 5.5 - -3.0)

70.1%

2.3(−0.1–4.8)

71.8%

−4.0(−5.8 - -2.5)

74.7%

−11.1(−13.5 - -8.4)

59.3%

eGFREPI_CysC_2012

8.4(7.3–9.6)

74.0%

13.1(10.7–15.7)

67.5%

8.6(7.0–10.1)

75.9%

3.3(1.2–5.5)

76.6%

eGFREPI_Cr_CysC_2012

9.6(8.6–10.7)

74.1%

15.2(13.1–17.3)

64.1%

9.8(8.4–11.2)

75.4%

3.8(1.7–5.8)

78.9%

eGFRFAS_Cr

−6.9(−8.5 - -5.4)

69.3%

−0.7(−3.8–2.5)

74.2%

−7.1(−9.2 - -4.9)

70.6%

−12.9(− 16.0 –− 9.9)

61.7%

eGFRFAS_CysC

10.8(9.7–11.9)

73.4%

15.9(13.5–18.3)

64.1%

11.0(9.5–12.6)

76.1%

5.3(3.2–7.4)

77.0%

eGFRFAS_Cr_CysC

4.1(3.0–5.1)

81.5%

9.9(7.8–12.1)

77.5%

4.0(2.5–5.5)

85.0%

−1.8(− 3.9–0.3)

78.5%

eGFRa_MDRD

−8.4(− 10.2 - -6.7)

63.0%

−3.7(− 7.3 - -0.1)

64.6%

− 8.5(− 10.9 - -6.0)

65.0%

−13.1(− 16.3 - -9.9)

59.8%

eGFRc_MDRD

−20.8(−23.0 - -18.6)

47.0%

−8.8(− 12.6 - -4.9)

45.5%

−20.5(−23.9 - -17.5)

51.1%

−24.8(−28.6 - -20.5)

40.2%

  1. Compared with mGFR, P < 0.01;
  2. ▲Compared with mGFR, P < 0.05;
  3. □Compared with mGFR, P = 0.061;
  4. ■Compared with mGFR, P = 0.401
  5. Compared with mGFR, P = 0.679;
  6. Compared with mGFR, P = 0.095;