Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariate regression analysis of the correlations between the glomerular hyperfiltration and skinfold by gender

From: The association between skinfold thicknesses and estimated glomerular filtration rate in adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Exposure

Effect size OR (95%CI), P-value

Crude model

Minimally adjusted model

Fully adjusted model

Male

 TSFT (mm)

1.046 (1.027, 1.066) < 0.00001

1.043 (1.023, 1.064) 0.00002

1.065 (1.044, 1.087) < 0.00001

 SSFT (mm)

1.029 (1.009, 1.050) 0.00379

1.026 (1.005, 1.047) 0.01466

1.051 (1.028, 1.074) 0.00001

Female

 TSFT (mm)

1.006 (0.983, 1.030) 0.61541

1.002 (0.977, 1.027) 0.90162

1.018 (0.991, 1.046) 0.19411

 SSFT (mm)

1.010 (0.989, 1.032) 0.34360

1.006 (0.984, 1.029) 0.60648

1.021 (0.996, 1.047) 0.10792

Total

 TSFT (mm)

1.030 (1.015, 1.045) 0.00009

1.026 (1.010, 1.041) 0.00111

1.043 (1.027, 1.060) < 0.00001

 SSFT (mm)

1.020 (1.006, 1.035) 0.00640

1.016 (1.001, 1.032) 0.03670

1.036 (1.019, 1.053) 0.00003

  1. After stratification by gender, multiple regression analysis showed that TSFT and SSFT were risk factors for glomerular hyperfiltration only in boys
  2. TSFT triceps skinfold thickness, SSFT subscapular skinfold thickness
  3. Note: Crude model: We did not adjust any covariants. Minimally adjusted model: We adjusted age, race, and standing height. Fully adjusted model: We adjusted age, standing height, race, family income, blood urea nitrogen and uric acid variables
Back to article page

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us