The difference between patients with nephrotic syndrome and nephrotic-range proteinuria in IgA nephropathy: a propensity score matched cohort study

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of factors affecting primary outcome

Variables	Univariate analysis		Multivariate analysis
Variables	OR (95%CI)	P	OR (95%CI)	P
Age (y)	1.006 (0.972–1.041)	0.752
eGFR (ml/min.1.73m²)	0.965 (0.947–0.985)	< 0.001	0.980 (0.955–1.005)	0.119
SBP (mm Hg)	1.062 (1.029–1.096)	< 0.001	1.047 (1.009–1.087)	0.016
ALB (g/l)	0.983 (0.913–1.058)	0.647
ALB high group (versus low group)	0.753 (0.300–1.888)	0.545
Uric acid (umol/l)	1.004 (1.000–1.009)	0.04	1.001 (0.995–1.007)	0.823
TC (mmol/l)	0.744 (0.511–1.083)	0.12
TG (mmol/l)	0.742 (0.453–1.213)	0.234
LDL (mmol/l)	0.819 (0.535–1.254)	0.358
UTP (g/24 h)	1 (1.000–1.001)	0.03	1 (1.000–1.001)	0.223
M1 (versus M0)	1.517 (0.174–13.263)	0.706
S1 (versus S0)	0.913 (0.272–3.068)	0.884
E1 (versus E0)	1.872 (0.676–5.187)	0.228
T1 + T2 (versusT0)	3.815 (1.668–8.726)	0.002	2.656 (0.869–8.114)	0.087
C1 + C2 (versus C0)	2.395 (1.131–5.073)	0.023	1.898 (0.689–5.230)	0.215

SBP Systolic Pressure, HB Hemoglobin, eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Alb Albumin, MEST-C, M Mesangial hypercellularity, E Endocapillary hypercellularity, S Segmental glomerulosclerosis, T Tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, C Crescent

ISSN: 1471-2369