Urate lowering therapy in patients starting hemodialysis limit gout flares occurrence: ten years retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Uncontrolled gout can cause articular impairment but is also associated with a global and cardiovascular excess mortality, especially in dialysis population.

Data documented within existing research is not conclusive regarding gout flares evolution during hemodialysis and their control by urate lowering therapy (ULT).

Without clear guidelines concerning hemodialysis patients management with chronic gout, this study proposes to investigate whether gout flare incidence reduction could be observed on this population treated by urate lowering therapy versus patients without treatment.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study in two hemodialysis centers in France. Were selected patients over 18 years old with a gout history who started hemodialysis between January 2005 and September 2015.

Demographics and clinicals data were recorded at hemodialysis start and throughout 5 years of follow up. Gout flare was defined as presence of uric acid crystal in joint punction or clinically diagnosed as such with a colchicine prescription.

All statistical analysis were performed in SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

One hundred eighty-one patients have been included, mean age at dialysis initiation was 68.6 years (± 12.4) with 72% of men, 54% were treated by ULT: 89.7% by allopurinol and 9.3% by febuxostat. One patient received both treatments successively. After hemodialysis initiation, 35.36% patients had experienced at least one gout flare. The appearance of at least one gout flare concerned 50% of patients in no ULT group and 22.68% patients in ULT group (p = 0.0002).

Dialysis efficiency was measured at regular interval during follow-up and was similar in both groups.

To study the association strength between clinical factors and gout flares occurrences, a Cox model was performed; ULT is a protector factor of gout flare (HR:0,42, CI 95: 0,25-0,71).

The proportion of serum urate values within the target (median 53% vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher in ULT group versus no ULT group (median 53% vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Urate lowering therapy limit new gout flares occurrence in hemodialysis patients with gout historyCollaboration between rheumatologists and nephrologists may help to update guidelines for urate-lowering therapies in patients on dialysis.

Introduction

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at greater risk of developing gout flares due to a reduction of uric acid renal clearance [1]. It is known in the literature that the decrease of renal function generates a state of hyperuricemia, also a vector of urate nephropathy aggravating gouty pathology [2].

Data resulting of current research are contradictory on the evolution of gout flares during hemodialysis leading to the perception that hemodialysis alone would achieve extra-renal purification of uric acid without requiring urate lowering therapy (ULT) [3,4,5].

However, several studies have proven the persistence of gout flares in hemodialysis patients: a 2020 US study show that the incidence of active gout was 15.4% in the first five years [6]. Nevertheless, preliminary data suggests that the incidence of gout in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may be low, perhaps secondary to clearance of inflammatory mediators on hemodialysis [3].

It has also been shown that pharmacological management of gout in patients with chronic kidney disease is still suboptimal and subject of difficulties in clinical practice [7]. The use of ULT remains controversial, although most of clinical studies main criteria are based on reaching a target value of serum uric acid [8, 9].

Without clear guidelines regarding the management of hemodialysis patients, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether gout flare incidence was reduced on this population treated with urate lowering therapy.

Materials and methods

Data source and patient selection

We performed a retrospective cohort study on two hemodialysis centers in France: in the nephrology unit of Reims University Hospital and in the hemodialysis unit of Local Association for Home dialysis promotion in Reims.

We selected patients over 18 years old with a gout history and started hemodialysis between January 2005 and September 2015. Once hemodialysis started, patients should have been monitored through a minimum six months follow-up in the nephrology centers.

Patients’ selection was performed using a medical software “Hemadialyse®” containing medical records from both centers. Specific queries were performed using this software retaining the following criteria: “hemodialysis initiation between 01/01/2005 and 09/01/2015” AND “gout history (CIM-10 code M10.3)” OR “treatment by colchicine OR Colchimax® OR Allopurinol OR Zyloric ® OR Febuxostat OR Adenuric ®». The same query was addressed to Reims University hospital’s Medical Informations Department (MID). After removing duplicates, each medical file was analyzed.

All the patients were included with the agreement of the National Commission for Informatics and Freedoms. According to the French legislation, no ethics committee approval was required for such a retrospective study.

Variables of interest

Demographics and epidemiological data selected was comprised of: age, sex, ethnical origin, BMI, nephropathy type, hemodialysis initiations date, comorbidities through Charlson comorbidity index, cardiovascular comorbidities (history of hypertension, dyslipidemia and cardiopathy without cardiac failure).

We monitored through a five-year period each gout flares since hemodialysis initiation for all patients included in the study. The period was shortened in case of decease, dialysis center and/or technic change (peritoneal dialysis) or renal transplantation before the five years of follow-up.

Gout flares was defined as presence of sodium urate crystal in articular fluid after punction or medical gout flares diagnostic with colchicine prescription associated. We recorded number and the dates of each flare for each patient.

Hemodialysis efficiency was evaluated by recording urea reduction ratio (URR) three times a year and KT/V ratio only during each gout flare occurrences. Similarly, serum urate levels have been recorded for each patient three times a year during follow-up at fixed intervals. All patients underwent hemodialysis sessions three times a week.

The ULT prescription such as allopurinol or febuxostat, as well as their dosages and prescription duration were identified. Patients were considered as long-term ULT exposures when they were on ULT for more than 6 weeks following hemodialysis initiation.

We registered use and duration of hyperuricemic treatments such as angiotensin—converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, diuretics and platelet antiaggregants. Exposition to urate lowering therapy was analyzed by their type, duration and dosage.

Statistical analysis

Depending on tests validity conditions, descriptive analyses were performed using Fischer’s test and/or Chi-squared test Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test have been used for quantitative data. Bilateral analysis has been performed for each test with significative p-value < 0.05.

Kaplan-Meier curve have been conducted to assess gout flares and a Cox proportional hazards regression to study their association with clinicals factors. For each patient, we have calculated percent of serum urate level inferior of 360 µmol/L and a Mann-Whitney U test has been performed to compare these values between patients with and without long term urate lowering therapy.

All statistical analyses were performed in SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

Patients’ characteristics

One hundred eighty-one gouty patients have started hemodialysis between 2005 and 2015 and met study eligibility criteria. Within observation period, 97 patients (54%) were treated by long-term ULT (allopurinol or febuxostat) and 84 (46%) had no ULT after initiating hemodialysis.

In the no ULT group, 14/84 (17%) patients had a history of treatment by ULT: 13 were treated by allopurinol and one by adenuric. ULT were stopped for all patients before the hemodialysis beginning.

Figure 1 shows patient flow chart and exclusion criteria.

Fig. 1

Flow chart

Patients’ characteristics at baseline are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Population characteristics

The mean age of the population was 68.6 years (± 12.4 years). Patients treated with ULT were more often men (81.4% vs 63.1%; p = 0.007) and had a significantly higher BMI (27.87 kg/m2 vs 25.24 kg/m2; p = 0.005).

Patients from ULT and no ULT groups were similar regarding the initial nephropathy; these were mainly hypertensive, diabetic or mixed etiologies. Furthermore, there were no differences for cardiovascular comorbidities or for Charlson comorbidity index. There were no significant differences concerning treatment influencing serum urate level except for Angiotensin II receptor blockers: 13.4% of patients in no ULT group versus 30.9% in ULT group (p = 0.004).

In the ULT group, 87/97 patients (89.7%) received Allopurinol and 9/97 patients (9.3%) were treated with Febuxostat. One patient received both treatments successively. Allopurinol daily dose was 100 mg for 77 patients: 200 mg for 10 patients and 300 mg for two patients. Febuxostat daily dose was 80 mg for eight patients and 120 mg for one patient. The patient who received both was successively treated by Allopurinol 100 mg then Febuxostat 80 mg.

Survival analysis of gout flares occurrence

Survival analysis was performed to compare gout flares occurrence between groups (Fig. 2). Hemodialysis patients who received ULT had significantly fewer gout flares compared to the group without ULT (p = 0.0009).

Fig. 2

Survival curve for the onset of a gout flare according to Kaplan’s method

After hemodialysis initiation, 35.36% patients (64/181) had experienced at least one gout flare. The appearance of at least one gout flare concerned 50% of patients (42/84) in no ULT group and 22.68% patients (22/97) in ULT group (p = 0.0002). Repartition of gout flare through the five years of follow-up is described in Table 2.

Table 2 Gout flare repartition through time

Dialysis efficiency was measured at regular interval during follow-up and was similar in both groups: 80% of ULT group patients had URR > 60% versus 85% of no ULT group patients (p = 0.457). Among patients who had at least one gout flare, the mean number of gout flares was 1.27 (± 0.63) in ULT group with an average KT/V at the time of the gout flares of 0.91 (± 0.26) and 1.16 (± 0.38) in no ULT group with an average KT/V at the time of gout flares of 1.1 (± 0.21).

KT/V comparison between patients who experience at least one gout flare during follow-up versus those who did not in ULT group were similar (p = 0.7). Same results were found in the no ULT group (p = 0.355).

Factors associated with gout flare

To study the strength of association between clinicals factors and gout flares occurrences, a Cox model has been performed (Fig. 3). ULT is a protector factor of gout flare (HR:0,42, CI 95: 0,25-0,71). By using propensity score weighting, ULT decrease significantly gout flares occurrences (HR: 0,423, CI95: 0,235-0,762).

Fig. 3

Association between clinical factor and gout flare occurrence

Serum urate level variation analysis

To analyze serum urate level variation on this population, 1691 serum values from 177/181 patients were collected with a median number of values of nine (2-15) per patient. The median number of values collected per patient was the same in both groups.

For each patient, the percentage of serum urate values under 360 μmol/L, the target value, was calculated.

Groups of patients were performed according to the mean percentage of serum uric acid values under 360 μmol/L (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Patients distribution according to uric acid values at target < 360 µmol/L

Patients were grouped according to the mean percentage of serum uric acid values below 360 μmol/L as such: ≤ 25%, 26–50%, 51–75% and 76–100%.

Thirty-one % of patients had less than 25% of serum urate measurements within target and 23% of patients had serum urate within target on 76–100% of measurements (Fig. 5A). There was a significant difference between patients treated with and without urate-lowering agents after distribution by range of percentages of serum urate values below 360 μmol/L (p = 0.0003) (Fig. 5B). Forty-seven % of patients not treated with ULT had less than 25% of values below 360 μmol/L while 18% of patients treated with urate-lowering agents had less than 25% of values below 360 μmol/L. Furthermore, 29% of patients treated with ULT had more than 75% of values below 360 μmol/L, while 15% of patients without ULT had more than 75% of values below 360 μmol/L.

Fig. 5

Analysis of acid uric values in patients initiating hemodialysis. A Distribution of patients according to the mean percentage of acid uric values lower than 360 μmol/L. B Distribution of patients treated or not with ULT according to the mean percentage of acid uric values lower than 360 μmol/L

The proportion of serum urate values within the target (median 53% vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher in ULT group compared to no ULT group.

Discussion

We had hypothesized that hemodialysis was not sufficient to control clinical gout. To our knowledge, it is the first real-life cohort study with selective criteria showing the positive effect of urate lowering therapy on gout flares in patients starting hemodialysis.

Regarding gout clinical aspect, there are only few published studies: in a large German analysis of 601 patients from five dialysis centers, the incidence of gout flares in hemodialysis patients was only 3.6% versus 13.5% in a US dialysis cohort patients [5, 10]. However, in our study, gout flares affected a third of the patients within five years after the start of dialysis, provided that our population corresponded to patients with a history of gout flares before the start of dialysis.

Another study evaluated 216 patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, almost 25% of whom experienced gout, suggesting that hemodialysis alone is insufficient [8].

Yeo and al, showed that among adults treated with long-term dialysis, a minority have serum urate level at a target sufficient to prevent gout [8]. Forty-six percent of participants had a rate of less than 360 μmol/L on less than 25% of measurements. However, it was a cross-sectional retrospective study with no clinical data on long term for their population. In our study, its concerns 47% of hemodialysis patients in the no ULT group with five years data.

Most studies have assessed the effect of urate lowering therapy on serum urate level in hemodialysis patients [9, 11,12,13]. In our study, patients with ULT had a significant higher percentage of serum urate values within the target (< 360 μmol/L) than patients without ULT. Difference concerning rate of target serum urate values does not seem to be linked to a difference in dialysis efficiency between the two groups. We collected parameters evaluating the effectiveness of dialysis such as URR, which was comparable between the two groups. However, analysis did not take into account parameters evaluating long term effectiveness of dialysis by KT/V. These parameters were not collected and analyzed in this study due to the multitude of data that their collection would generate and because of their great variability over time. At the time of gout flares occurrences, the mean KT/V ratio seemed lower in patients on ULT while they had significantly fewer gout flares compared to the group without treatment. Thus, gout flares occurrences were less frequent despite dialysis appearing less effective at the time of gout flares in patients on ULT.

In literature, there are currently only case reports regarding the effectiveness of these treatments on gout flares in hemodialysis patients. Most studies focus on the influence of allopurinol or febuxostat on serum urate level in hemodialysis patients. A retrospective study carried out in New Zealand found a percentage of serum urate values ​​was within the target below 360 μmol/L which is not different between groups treated or not with Allopurinol in patients on hemodialysis and on peritoneal dialysis [8]. This study included smaller numbers and the two extra-renal purification techniques, which could explain the differences observed with our results. In addition, in our study, serum urate values ​​were recorded reproducibly and over the entire duration of follow-up.

With respect to febuxostat, a prospective Japanese placebo-controlled study analyzed its effect on serum urate level in 57 hemodialysis patients and found a significant decrease after two months of treatment in the Febuxostat group and not in the placebo group [13]. These results are consistent with our results.

Regarding urate lowering therapy efficiency on gout flares, there are only a few case reports showing the efficiency of the treatment for patients suffering from severe gout [14,15,16].

Our study confirms these results and that urate lowering therapy should be considered for patient with a history of gout starting dialysis. There are no sufficient tolerance studies of allopurinol or febuxostat in patients undergoing dialysis. Only four reports exists on the use of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in patients on hemodialysis, each showing these treatments as well-tolerated in gout patients undergoing dialysis [17,18,19,20]. No safety data has been collected in our study.

This retrospective and observational study has some limitations. Our data come from a single site, which may affect generalizability. Our inclusion criteria may have missed some eligible subjects, and we did not include patients on peritoneal dialysis. We identified gout flares but excluded corticosteroid intake, although we checked the absence of gout flares during corticoid intake.

In conclusion, when considering gout patients starting hemodialysis, urate lowering therapy limited the occurrence of new gout flares compared to patients not treated. To our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing long term effect of urate lowering therapy in hemodialysis patients on gout flares.

Results from this analysis may have implications in managing dialysis patients with history of gout. Further research on this topic and collaboration between rheumatologists and nephrologists may help to inform updated guidelines specifically for urate-lowering therapy in patients on dialysis.