Figure 4From: Optimising the accuracy of blood pressure monitoring in chronic kidney disease: the utility of BpTRU Comparison between first BpTRU reading and average BpTRU reading. A. Combined data for all patients, showing mean individual and average BpTRU systolic readings. ANOVA (repeated measures) showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001). Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post hoc test showed that the mean first BpTRU systolic measurement (± SD) (133.8 ± 22.5 mmHg) was significantly higher than the final average BpTRU systolic measurement (127.9 ± 19.0 mmHg; n = 91; P < 0.001). B. Combined data showing mean individual and average BpTRU diastolic readings. ANOVA (repeated measures) showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001); the subsequent Bonferroni’s post hoc test showed that the mean first BpTRU diastolic reading (81.2 ± 13.3 mmHg) was significantly higher than the final average BpTRU diastolic reading (80.2 ± 13.0 mmHg; n = 91; P < 0.001).Back to article page