Skip to main content

Table 2 Laboratory data of Gitelman-like syndrome patients after cisplatin treatment.

From: Gitelman-like syndrome after cisplatin therapy: a case report and literature review

Ref.

Age/Sex

Type of Cancer

Cisplatin dose (mg/m2)

K+ (mEq/l)

Mg++ (mg/dl)

FEMg (%)

FECa (%)

GFR (ml/m/1.73 m2)

Persist (yrs)

1988 (3)

22/M

Testicular

459–954◆¤

3.4–3.9◆ψ

1.4

8.9â– 

0.9â– 

88

2–6◆¤

1988 (3)

36/M

Testicular

459–954◆¤

3.4–3.9◆ψ

1.2

8.9â– 

0.9â– 

100

2–6◆¤

1988 (3)

39/M

Testicular

459–954◆¤

3.4–3.9◆ψ

1.1

8.9â– 

0.9â– 

117

2–6◆¤

1988 (3)

25/M

Testicular

459–954◆¤

3.4–3.9◆ψ

1.4

8.9â– 

0.9â– 

69

2–6◆¤

1988 (3)

27/M

Testicular

459–954◆¤

3.4–3.9◆ψ

1.1

8.9â– 

0.9â– 

105

2–6◆¤

1988 (3)

24/M

Testicular

459–954◆¤

3.4–3.9◆ψ

1.6

8.9â– 

0.9â– 

85

2–6◆¤

1990 (4)

8.5/M

Neuroblastoma

720

3.4

1.6

5.5

0.2

85

1.5

1990 (4)

11/F

Neuroblastoma

1,710

3.7

1.8

3.4

0.1

102

3.5

1990 (4)

8/M

Neuroblastoma

630

3.6

1.2

8.3

0.2

79

1

1991 (5)

13* (4 patients)

Neuroblastoma Sarcomas

310–1,710◆¤

3.2 ♣

1.4♣

4.3â– 

0.42â– 

85â– 

1.5*

Our case

42/F

Ovarian

No data

3.4â—‡

1.3â—‡

8.5

0.6

80

20

Mean +/- SD

21.0 + 11.1

 

872 +280

3.4 +0.1

1.4 +0.2

6.9 +2.2

0.6 +0.3

89 +12

3.8 +4.5

  1. â—† No individual patient data reported.
  2. ¤ Use mean value to represent data for calculation of table mean.
  3. ψ Use lowest value to represent data for calculation of table mean.
  4. â–  Mean value for all patients from the same study.
  5. ♣ Calculated number from figure 1 in ref 5. ◇ Mean value of 1986–2004 data.
  6. * Median value for 12 patients with cisplatin therapy in ref 5.