Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
1 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marion Coulter-Mackie |
6 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gill Rumsby |
9 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - antonio amoroso |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - asma omezzine |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gill Rumsby |
15 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marion Coulter-Mackie |
25 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - asma omezzine |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - asma omezzine |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
16 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - asma omezzine |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
16 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
21 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - asma omezzine |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
21 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
25 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
25 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2369-12-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.