Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 1 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nisha Bansal |
| 3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Okada Tomonari |
| 6 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kunitoshi Iseki |
| 14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Moniek Cornelia Maria de Goeij |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 15 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Okada Tomonari |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 25 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nisha Bansal |
| 3 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kunitoshi Iseki |
| 10 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Moniek Cornelia Maria de Goeij |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 10 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 11 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Moniek Cornelia Maria de Goeij |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 11 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2369-12-38 |
You can find further information about peer review here.