Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Guy Rostoker |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Selby |
| 31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - charles chazot |
| 8 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Guy Rostoker |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Selby |
| 25 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - charles chazot |
| 6 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Guy Rostoker |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 6 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Guy Rostoker |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 30 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Guy Rostoker |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 30 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2369-12-58 |
You can find further information about peer review here.