Skip to main content

Table 3 Model 1: results and MRS (i.e. utility value of other attributes expressed in terms of trade-off with 1 year waiting time) for patients, carers, donors, and healthcare workers

From: Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation?: Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments

Attribute

Coefficient : patients

Implied MRS for patients

 

Coefficient : dummies for the carer group

Implied MRS for carers

Wald test p-values: Carers vs. patients

Wait

.0443**

1

 

-.0156

1

 

Tiss

.0624**

1.41*

 

am

0.76

p=0.0024

  

(1.08 / 1.74)

  

(−1.42 / 2.93)

 

Dep

.0635**

1.43*

 

-.0585*

0.17

p<0.0001

  

(1.17 / 1.69)

  

(−1.54 / 1.89)

 

Age

.0069**

0.16*

 

.0006

0.26

p=0.0750

  

(0.12 / 0.19)

  

(−0.03 / 0.56 )

 

dis1

-.0004

−0.01

 

.1205

4.18

p=0.2965

  

(−1.03 / 1.01)

  

(−3.25 / 11.62)

 

dis2

.6789**

15.32*

 

-.1971

16.79*

p<0.0001

  

(13.45 / 17.20)

  

(2.69 / 30.89)

 

ill1

-.1207**

−2.73*

 

.1130

−0.27

p=0.1236

  

(−1.45 / -4.00)

  

(−9.55 / 9.01)

 

ill2

.1850**

4.18*

 

-.0334

5.28

p=0.0910

  

(3.12 / 5.23)

  

(−2.27 / 12.83)

 

Intercepts

.1208**

  

-.0034

  

Attribute

Coefficient : dummies for the donor group

Implied MRS for donors

Wald test p- values: Donors vs. patients

Coefficient : dummies for the healthcare worker group

Implied MRS for healthcare workers

Wald test p- values: healthcare workers vs. patients

Wait

-.0086

1

 

-.0039

1

 

Tiss

-.0667*

−0.12

p<0.0001

-.0110

1.27*

p=0.0027

  

(−1.62 / 1.38)

  

(0.24 / 2.31)

 

Dep

-.0468*

0.47

p<0.0001

-.0003

1.56*

p=0.0017

  

(−0.79 / 1.73)

  

(0.72 / 2.41)

 

Age

-.0023

0.13

p=0.0067

.0127**

0.48*

p=0.0300

  

(−0.05 / 0.31)

  

(0.31 / 0.66)

 

dis1

.1508

4.22

p=0.1669

.1823**

4.50*

p=0.0265

  

(−1.38 / 9.81)

  

(1.09 / 7.91 )

 

dis2

-.2676*

11.54*

p<0.0001

.1056

19.42*

p<0.0001

  

(2.90 / 20.17)

  

(12.71 / 26.14)

 

ill1

.0520

−1.93

p=0.2301

.0501

−1.75

p=0.1048

  

(−8.66 / 4.80)

  

(−5.74 / 2.24)

 

ill2

.0245

5.87*

p=0.1942

.1790*

9.01*

p=0.9818

  

(0.18 / 11.57)

  

(5.44 / 12.59 )

 

Intercepts

-.112

  

.0844

  
  1. *: Significant at 5% level; Figures in parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals for point estimates.