Skip to main content

Table 3 Model 1: results and MRS (i.e. utility value of other attributes expressed in terms of trade-off with 1 year waiting time) for patients, carers, donors, and healthcare workers

From: Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation?: Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments

Attribute Coefficient : patients Implied MRS for patients   Coefficient : dummies for the carer group Implied MRS for carers Wald test p-values: Carers vs. patients
Wait .0443** 1   -.0156 1  
Tiss .0624** 1.41*   am 0.76 p=0.0024
   (1.08 / 1.74)    (−1.42 / 2.93)  
Dep .0635** 1.43*   -.0585* 0.17 p<0.0001
   (1.17 / 1.69)    (−1.54 / 1.89)  
Age .0069** 0.16*   .0006 0.26 p=0.0750
   (0.12 / 0.19)    (−0.03 / 0.56 )  
dis1 -.0004 −0.01   .1205 4.18 p=0.2965
   (−1.03 / 1.01)    (−3.25 / 11.62)  
dis2 .6789** 15.32*   -.1971 16.79* p<0.0001
   (13.45 / 17.20)    (2.69 / 30.89)  
ill1 -.1207** −2.73*   .1130 −0.27 p=0.1236
   (−1.45 / -4.00)    (−9.55 / 9.01)  
ill2 .1850** 4.18*   -.0334 5.28 p=0.0910
   (3.12 / 5.23)    (−2.27 / 12.83)  
Intercepts .1208**    -.0034   
Attribute Coefficient : dummies for the donor group Implied MRS for donors Wald test p- values: Donors vs. patients Coefficient : dummies for the healthcare worker group Implied MRS for healthcare workers Wald test p- values: healthcare workers vs. patients
Wait -.0086 1   -.0039 1  
Tiss -.0667* −0.12 p<0.0001 -.0110 1.27* p=0.0027
   (−1.62 / 1.38)    (0.24 / 2.31)  
Dep -.0468* 0.47 p<0.0001 -.0003 1.56* p=0.0017
   (−0.79 / 1.73)    (0.72 / 2.41)  
Age -.0023 0.13 p=0.0067 .0127** 0.48* p=0.0300
   (−0.05 / 0.31)    (0.31 / 0.66)  
dis1 .1508 4.22 p=0.1669 .1823** 4.50* p=0.0265
   (−1.38 / 9.81)    (1.09 / 7.91 )  
dis2 -.2676* 11.54* p<0.0001 .1056 19.42* p<0.0001
   (2.90 / 20.17)    (12.71 / 26.14)  
ill1 .0520 −1.93 p=0.2301 .0501 −1.75 p=0.1048
   (−8.66 / 4.80)    (−5.74 / 2.24)  
ill2 .0245 5.87* p=0.1942 .1790* 9.01* p=0.9818
   (0.18 / 11.57)    (5.44 / 12.59 )  
Intercepts -.112    .0844   
  1. *: Significant at 5% level; Figures in parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals for point estimates.
Back to article page

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us