Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for contrast-induced nephropathy according to the E/E’ levels (Multivariate logistic regression analysis)

From: Diastolic dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study

 

E/E’

OR

95% CI

p

aModel 1

1.091

1.026-1.159

0.005

bModel 2

3.435

1.522-7.755

0.003

cModel 3

3.344

1.456-7.682

0.004

dModel 4

2.579

1.082-5.964

0.035

  1. a Model 1 (odds ratio per 1 increase in E/E’) : adjusted for age (> 75 years vs. ≤ 75 years), BMI, hypertension, diabetes, emergent/ urgent procedure, 3-vessel disease, IABP use, volume of CM per weight, eGFR (< 60 mL/min/1.73m2 vs. eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2), hemoglobin, albumin, and hs-CRP.
  2. b Model 2 (odds ratio for E/E’ > 15 vs. E/E’ ≤ 15) : adjusted for age (> 75 years vs. ≤ 75 years), BMI, hypertension, diabetes, emergent/ urgent procedure, 3-vessel disease, IABP use, volume of CM per weight, eGFR (< 60 mL/min/1.73m2 vs. eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2), hemoglobin, albumin, and hs-CRP.
  3. c Model 3 (odds ratio for E/E’ > 15 vs. E/E’ ≤ 15) : adjusted for Model 2 plus ejection fraction (≤ 40% vs. > 40%).
  4. d Model 4 (odds ratio for E/E’ > 15 vs. E/E’ ≤ 15) : adjusted for Model 3 plus left atrial volume index (> 35 vs. ≤ 35).
  5. Abbreviations: BMI body mass index; IABP intra-aortic balloon pump; CM contrast media; eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate; hs-CRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Back to article page

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us