Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes of FMD, NO, ET-1, ACR, eGFR-Cr, and eGFR-Cys C throughout follow-up period

From: Excessive visit-to-visit glycemic variability independently deteriorates the progression of endothelial and renal dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

 

Total (n = 239)

Classified by tertile of SD of HbA1c

Classified by tertile of SD of FPG

First tertile group (n = 79)

Second tertile group (n = 80)

Third tertile group (n = 80)

P value

First tertile group (n = 79)

Second tertile group (n = 80)

Third tertile group (n = 80)

P value

Change percentage of FMD (%)a

0.93 (−3.10, 4.92)

4.18 (1.62, 6.14)

−0.20 (−2.94, 4.18)*

−2.34 (−4.96, 1.58)*,**

<0.001

2.37 (−1.46, 5.69)

0.69 (−3.05, 5.50)

−1.43 (−4.26, 3.27)*,**

0.001

Change percentage of NO (%)a

1.20 (−6.40, 8.80)

7.61 (2.60, 12.18)

−0.94 (−6.10, 6.08)*

−5.45 (−10.00, 2.93)*,**

<0.001

4.29 (−5.05, 11.58)

3.00 (−6.85, 8.80)*

−2.01 (−7.45, 5.28)*

0.002

Change percentage of ET-1 (%)b

−0.85 ± 5.16

−3.03 ± 4.61

−0.75 ± 5.17*

1.23 ± 4.82*,**

<0.001

−2.06 ± 4.65

−0.97 ± 5.41

0.49 ± 5.16*

0.006

Change percentage of ACR (%)a

−2.09 (−6.11,2.55)

−6.43 (−8.91, −2.53)

−2.09 (−4.78, 0.24)*

3.10 (−1.36, 6.28)*,**

<0.001

−3.48 (−7.52, −0.50)

−2.09 (−6.06, 2.35)*

−0.02 (−3.83, 5.83)*,**

<0.001

Change percentage of eGFR-Cr (%)b

2.73 ± 6.43

7.49 ± 5.94

1.94 ± 5.35*

−1.24 ± 4.65*,**

<0.001

3.74 ± 5.90

2.83 ± 6.24

1.61 ± 7.00

0.101

Change percentage of eGFR-Cys C (%)b

2.35 ± 5.84

6.64 ± 5.37

1.66 ± 4.89*

−1.25 ± 4.24*,**

<0.001

3.26 ± 5.34

2.47 ± 5.66

1.32 ± 6.36

0.097

  1. Results are means ± SDs or medians (25th, 75th percentiles)
  2. acompared using ANOVA with Bonferroni procedure
  3. bcompared using Kruskal-Wallis test
  4. *P < 0.05, vs. first tertile group
  5. **P < 0.05, vs. second tertile group