Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary – outcomes measured and applications of CQI by primary discipline, n (%). [N = 76 total studies; references below table]

From: Continuous quality improvement in nephrology: a systematic review

 

ESRD (n = 46)

CKD (n = 19)

Transplant (n = 1)

AKI (n = 5)

Interventional (n = 4)

Other (n = 1)

Outcomes

 Baseline/one-time only

13 (28%)

6 (31%)

 

1 (20%)

 

1 (100%)

 Pre/post outcome measures

29 (63%)

7 (37%)

1 (100%)

4 (80%)

3 (75%)

 

 Unclear or no outcomes measured

4 (9%)

5 (26%)

  

1 (25%)

 

Type(s) of outcome(s)a

 Clinical

34 (74%)

9 (47%)

1 (100%)

3 (60%)

2 (50%)

 

 Cost/efficiency

14 (30%)

4 (21%)

1 (100%)

2 (40%)

1 (25%)

 

Explicit CQI technique(s) usedb

 To identify problems

33 (72%)

15 (79%)

1 (100%)

5 (100%)

2 (50%)

 

 To identify/address solutions

19 (41%)

7 (36%)

1 (100%)

4 (80%)

1 (25%)

1 (100%)

 Use of interdisciplinary teams

28 (61%)

12 (63%)

1 (100%)

2 (40%)

3 (75%)

 
  1. aNote: studies may have included more than one type of outcome
  2. bNote: studies may have used CQI to identify problems and address solutions
  3. ESRD references: [27, 31, 45–88]
  4. CKD references: [28, 89–106]
  5. Transplant reference: [107]
  6. AKI references: [26, 30, 108–110]
  7. Interventional nephrology references: [111–114]
  8. Other (this study was aimed at nephrology discipline in general) reference: [115]