Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of screening strategies

From: Strategies and cost-effectiveness evaluation of persistent albuminuria screening among high-risk population of chronic kidney disease

 

DAY-1

Random

DAY-1 + Random

DAY-1 + DAY-2

DAY-1+ Random + DAY-2

Validity Assessments

 True Positive No.

82

79

79

79

77

 Sensitivity %

100

96.34

96.34

96.34

93.9

 95%CI

95.6–100.0

89.7–99.2

89.7–99.2

89.7–99.2

86.3–98.0

 True Negative No.

52

35

57

58

61

 Specificity %

69.3

46. 7

76.0

77.3

81.3

 95%CI

57.6–79.5

35.1–58.6

64.7–85.1

66.2–86.2

70.7–89.4

 False Positive No.

23

40

18

17

14

 False Positive %

30.7

53.3

24.0

22.7

18.7

 95%CI

20.5–42.4

41.5–65.0

14.9–35.3

13.8–33.8

10.6–29.3

 False Negative No.

0

3

3

3

5

 False Negative %

0

3.66

3.66

3.66

6.1

 95%CI

0–4.4

0.8–10.3

0.8–10.3

0.8–10.3

2.0–13.7

 PPV %

78.1

66.4

81.4

82.3

84.6

 NPV %

100.0

92.1

95.0

95.1

92.4

 Accuracy %

85.4

72.6

86.6

87.3

87.9

Cost-effectiveness Analysis

 Cost (¥)

5167.42

11063.42

9035.12

18652.73

 Incremental Cost (¥)

0.00

2028.30

3867.70

7589.32

 Effectiveness (QALYs)

10.85

11.13

10.88

11.87

 Incremental Effectiveness (QALYs)

0.00

0.25

0.03

0.73

 ICER (¥/QALYs)

0.00

8134.69

112335.88

10327.99

  1. PPV Positive Predict Value, NPV Negative Predict Value, QALY Quality-Adjusted of Life Year, ICER Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio