Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Nephrology

Fig. 3

From: Outcomes of bisphosphonate and its supplements for bone loss in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Fig. 3

Forest plot of network meta-analysis results. Treatments are reported in order of efficacy ranking according to SUCRAs. All treatments are compared to calcium. a Summary mean difference and 95% credible intervals from network meta-analysis of absolute BMD change at the femoral neck; b Summary mean difference and 95% credible intervals from network meta-analysis of percent BMD change at the femoral neck; c Summary mean difference and 95% credible intervals from network meta-analysis of absolute BMD change at the lumbar spine; d Summary mean difference and 95% credible intervals from network meta-analysis of percent BMD change at the lumbar spine; MD: mean difference; CrI: credible intervals; SUCRA: surface under the cumulative ranking curve; Ca: calcium; Bis: bisphosphonate; Vit D: Vitamin D analogs.

Back to article page