Comparisons | No. of directed trials (participants) | Pairwise meta-analysis mean differences (95% CI) | Network meta-analysis mean differences (95% CrI) | Heterogeneity I2 | P-Value | Quality of evidence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute BMD change at the femoral neck (536) | ||||||
 Bis+Ca vs. Bis+Ca + Vit D | 1 (29) | – | − 0.01 (− 0.32, 0.29) | – | – | Low |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca | 5 (167) | 1.3 (0.92, 1.68) | 0.19 (− 0.01, 0.38) | 94.70% | 0.000 | Low |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 2 (176) | 0.26 (−0.04, 0.56) | 0.06 (− 0.15, 0.26) | 38.10% | 0.184 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 2 (61) | 0.21 (−0.29, 0.72) | 0.06 (− 0.22, 0.36) | 24.60% | 0.249 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca | – | – | 0.20 (−0.14, 0.53) | – | – | Very low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Vit D | 4 (206) | 0.36 (0.08, 0.64) | 0.07 (−0.18, 0.30) | 67.60% | 0.026 | Low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | – | – | 0.07 (−0.34, 0.46) | – | – | Very low |
 Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 2 (46) | −0.74 (−1.34, − 0.14) | −0.13 (− 0.38, 0.13) | 0.00% | 0.403 | Low |
 Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 2 (60) | −0.55 (−1.07, − 0.03) | −0.12 (− 0.41, 0.19) | 60.20% | 0.113 | Low |
 Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 1 (30) | – | 0.00 (−0.30, 0.34) | – | – | Low |
Percent BMD change at the femoral neck (284) | ||||||
 Bis+Ca vs. Bis+Ca + Vit D | 1 (29) | – | −4.60 (−18.07, 7.67) | – | – | Low |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca | 4 (152) | 1.14 (0.78, 1.51) | 5.83 (1.61, 9.27) | 91.10% | 0.000 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 4 (46) | 1.55 (0.76, 2.35) | −0.24 (5.62, 9.79) | 96.10% | 0.000 | Low |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 1 (31) | – | −0.04 (−19.65, 18.12) | – | – | Low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca | – | – | 10.43 (−2.64, 23.31) | – | – | Very low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Vit D | – | – | 4.35 (−2.29, 11.37) | – | – | Very low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | – | – | 4.56 (−18.36, 19.16) | – | – | Very low |
 Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 3 (51) | −1.53 (−2.18, −0.88) | −6.07 (− 17.09, 4.47) | 79.30% | 0.028 | Low |
 Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 1 (30) | – | −5.87 (−20.01, 18.60) | – | – | Low |
 Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 1 (30) | – | 0.20 (−19.15, 19.61) | – | – | Low |
Absolute BMD change at the lumbar spine (814) | ||||||
 Bis+Ca vs. Bis+Ca + Vit D | 1 (29) | – | −0.01 (−0.06, 0.04) | – | – | Low |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca | 5 (167) | 0.51 (0.20, 0.82) | 0.06 (0.02, 0.09) | 0.00% | 0.571 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 4 (176) | 0.19 (−0.11, 0.49) | 0.01 (−0.03, 0.06) | 0.00% | 0.866 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 2 (61) | 0.49 (−0.02, 1.00) | 0.05 (−0.01, 0.11) | 24.60% | 0.250 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca | 1 (30) | – | 0.07 (0.00, 0.13) | – | – | Low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Vit D | 8 (484) | 0.38 (0.19, 0.57) | 0.03 (0.00, 0.05) | 92.10% | 0.000 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | – | – | 0.06 (−0.01, 0.15) | – | – | Very low |
 Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 2 (46) | −0.40 (− 0.99, 0.18) | −0.04 (− 0.10, 0.02) | 0.00% | 0.960 | Moderate |
 Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 2 (60) | −0.04 (− 0.55, 0.47) | −0.01 (− 0.07, 0.06) | 0.00% | 0.874 | Moderate |
 Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | – | – | 0.04 (−0.04, 0.12) | – | – | Very low |
Percent BMD change at the lumbar spine (466) | ||||||
 Bis+Ca vs.  Bis+Ca + Vit D | – | – | −3.27 (−7.87, 0.84) | – | – | Very low |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca | 4 (152) | 1.17 (0.80, 1.54) | 7.24 (3.73, 10.69) | 91.70% | 0.000 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 2 (46) | 1.53 (0.79, 2.27) | 2.22 (−1.44, 5.73) | 94.10% | 0.000 | Low |
 Bis+Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 1 (31) | – | 3.13 (−2.51, 8.51) | – | – | Low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca | – | – | 10.50 (5.92, 15.34) | – | – | Very low |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Vit D | 3 (145) | 1.32 (1.02, 1.62) | 5.48 (2.57, 8.42) | 98.30% | 0.000 | Moderate |
 Bis+Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | – | – | 6.39 (0.55, 12.89) | – | – | Low |
 Ca vs. Ca + Vit D | 2 (51) | −2.73 (−3.51, −1.95) | −5.02 (−8.84, − 1.20) | 0.00% | 0.373 | Moderate |
 Ca vs. Ca + Calcitonin | 1 (30) | – | −4.11 (−9.01, 0.72) | – | – | Low |
 Ca + Vit D vs. Ca + Calcitonin | – | – | 0.91 (−4.38, 6.44) | – | – | Very low |